Which has the lower trailing P/E, RYCEY or SMEGF?

RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: RYCEY trades at 14.89 and SMEGF at 48.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RYCEY or SMEGF?

Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — RYCEY at a 12.71% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.96%.

Does RYCEY or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?

RYCEY yields 0.39% and SMEGF yields 0.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RYCEY or SMEGF more profitable?

RYCEY runs the higher net margin — RYCEY at 26.94% versus SMEGF at 7.00%.

How have RYCEY and SMEGF total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, RYCEY delivered 7.98% and SMEGF delivered 43.59% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)

A side-by-side comparison of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

RYCEY

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

$172.00B

$20.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

SMEGF

Siemens Energy AG

$151.38B

$176.98IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:53 PM EDT

Total return — RYCEY vs SMEGF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

RYCEY +1262.1% (+54.5%/yr)SMEGF +588.1% (+37.9%/yr)RYCEY compounded faster over this window

RYCEY SMEGF

RYCEY vs SMEGF: by the numbers

•RYCEY is the larger company ($172.00B vs $151.38B market cap).
•RYCEY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 48.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RYCEY converts more revenue to profit (26.94% vs 7.00% net margin).
•RYCEY grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.71% vs 7.96% CAGR).
•SMEGF pays the higher dividend yield (0.47% vs 0.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RYCEY	SMEGF
P/E ratio	14.89	48.61
Forward P/E	47.84	33.61
P/S ratio	6.13	3.09
P/B ratio	45.95	12.29
EV / EBITDA	28.16	22.71
FCF yield	2.83%	6.15%

Profitability

Metric	RYCEY	SMEGF
Gross margin	29.12%	20.74%
Operating margin	16.82%	9.00%
Net margin	26.94%	7.00%
ROE	209.94%	27.86%
ROIC	15.14%	14.46%

Dividends

Metric	RYCEY	SMEGF
Dividend yield	0.39%	0.47%
Payout ratio	8.77%	36.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RYCEY	SMEGF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.71%	7.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	45.13%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.55%	62.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	68.17%	43.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RYCEY or SMEGF?: RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: RYCEY trades at 14.89 and SMEGF at 48.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RYCEY or SMEGF?: Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — RYCEY at a 12.71% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.96%.
Does RYCEY or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?: RYCEY yields 0.39% and SMEGF yields 0.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RYCEY or SMEGF more profitable?: RYCEY runs the higher net margin — RYCEY at 26.94% versus SMEGF at 7.00%.
How have RYCEY and SMEGF total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, RYCEY delivered 7.98% and SMEGF delivered 43.59% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RYCEY analysis Full SMEGF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Rolls-Royce P/E ratio Siemens Energy AG P/E ratio Rolls-Royce dividend yield Siemens Energy AG dividend yield Rolls-Royce ROE Siemens Energy AG ROE Rolls-Royce operating margin Siemens Energy AG operating margin Rolls-Royce revenue growth Siemens Energy AG revenue growth Rolls-Royce free cash flow Siemens Energy AG free cash flow

Rolls-Royce & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.