Rollins, Inc. (ROL) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)

A side-by-side comparison of Rollins, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnROL vs SWK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
ROL +4521.4%SWK +685.5%ROL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$4,621$786
ROL SWK

ROL vs SWK: by the numbers

  • ROL is the larger company ($18.16B vs $15.69B market cap).
  • SWK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.46 vs 34.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • ROL converts more revenue to profit (13.55% vs 4.07% net margin).
  • ROL grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.34% vs -0.16% CAGR).
  • SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.20% vs 1.89%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricROLSWK
P/E ratio34.3125.46
Forward P/E32.8422.85
P/S ratio4.631.04
P/B ratio12.711.77
PEG ratio4.070.82
EV / EBITDA22.2211.50
FCF yield3.41%8.14%

Profitability

MetricROLSWK
Gross margin50.71%31.72%
Operating margin18.68%8.34%
Net margin13.55%4.07%
ROE37.19%6.93%
ROIC20.95%6.41%

Dividends

MetricROLSWK
Dividend yield1.89%3.20%
Payout ratio65.37%125.28%

Growth (annualized)

MetricROLSWK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)11.34%-0.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.08%-19.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.34%0.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)1.08%-8.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ROL or SWK?
SWK has the lower trailing P/E: ROL trades at 34.31 and SWK at 25.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ROL or SWK?
Over the past five years, ROL grew revenue faster — ROL at a 11.34% CAGR versus SWK at -0.16%.
Does ROL or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
ROL yields 1.89% and SWK yields 3.20% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ROL or SWK more profitable?
ROL runs the higher net margin — ROL at 13.55% versus SWK at 4.07%.
How have ROL and SWK total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, ROL delivered 13.29% and SWK delivered 0.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 9, 2026.