Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) vs Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust (VCV)
Over the past 3 years, VCV lagged ROE — 9.34% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF and Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — ROE vs VCV
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yMetrics side by side
Did VCV beat ROE?
Over the past 3 years, VCV lagged ROE — 9.34% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | ROE | VCV |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 24.38% | -8.11% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 23.75% | 9.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -2.50% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | N/A | 1.05% |
ROE is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has VCV beaten ROE?
- Over the past 3 years, VCV lagged ROE — 9.34% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.