Which has the lower trailing P/E, RMBS or TTD?

TTD has the lower trailing P/E: RMBS trades at 44.23 and TTD at 20.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RMBS or TTD?

Over the past five years, TTD grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 22.51% CAGR versus TTD at 27.10%.

Is RMBS or TTD more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.69% versus TTD at 14.57%.

How have RMBS and TTD total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, RMBS delivered 20.49% and TTD delivered -26.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD)

A side-by-side comparison of Rambus Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$9.49B

$87.75TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TTD

The Trade Desk, Inc.

$8.89B

$18.91TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — RMBS vs TTD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

RMBS +630.5%TTD +494.0%RMBS compounded faster

RMBS TTD

RMBS vs TTD: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($9.49B vs $8.89B market cap).
•TTD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.09 vs 44.23 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 14.57% net margin).
•TTD grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.10% vs 22.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RMBS	TTD
P/E ratio	44.23	20.09
Forward P/E	32.09	17.93
P/S ratio	14.00	2.87
P/B ratio	7.22	3.48
PEG ratio	1.53	2.75
EV / EBITDA	36.02	11.14
FCF yield	3.17%	9.81%

Profitability

Metric	RMBS	TTD
Gross margin	78.27%	77.83%
Operating margin	35.51%	20.26%
Net margin	31.69%	14.57%
ROE	16.34%	17.63%
ROIC	15.03%	13.38%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RMBS	TTD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.51%	27.10%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	48.76%	12.09%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.48%	18.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.60%	-26.38%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RMBS or TTD?: TTD has the lower trailing P/E: RMBS trades at 44.23 and TTD at 20.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RMBS or TTD?: Over the past five years, TTD grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 22.51% CAGR versus TTD at 27.10%.
Is RMBS or TTD more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.69% versus TTD at 14.57%.
How have RMBS and TTD total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, RMBS delivered 20.49% and TTD delivered -26.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RMBS analysis Full TTD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Rambus P/E ratio Trade Desk P/E ratio Rambus dividend yield Trade Desk dividend yield Rambus ROE Trade Desk ROE Rambus operating margin Trade Desk operating margin Rambus revenue growth Trade Desk revenue growth Rambus free cash flow Trade Desk free cash flow

Rambus & Trade Desk appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.