Which has the lower trailing P/E, RMBS or SANM?

SANM has the lower trailing P/E: RMBS trades at 51.36 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RMBS or SANM?

Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 22.51% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.

Is RMBS or SANM more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.69% versus SANM at 2.41%.

How have RMBS and SANM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, RMBS delivered 23.98% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) vs Sanmina Corporation (SANM)

A side-by-side comparison of Rambus Inc. and Sanmina Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$12.14B

$111.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SANM

Sanmina Corporation

$12.28B

$229.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — RMBS vs SANM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

RMBS +763.5% (+24.1%/yr)SANM +698.7% (+23.1%/yr)RMBS compounded faster over this window

RMBS SANM

RMBS vs SANM: by the numbers

•SANM is the larger company ($12.28B vs $12.14B market cap).
•SANM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.97 vs 51.36 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 2.41% net margin).
•RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.51% vs 12.21% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RMBS	SANM
P/E ratio	51.36	40.97
Forward P/E	36.87	16.44
PEG ratio	N/A	2.30
P/S ratio	16.06	0.96
P/B ratio	8.28	4.80
EV / EBITDA	39.79	15.81
FCF yield	2.47%	4.84%

Profitability

Metric	RMBS	SANM
Gross margin	78.27%	9.01%
Operating margin	35.51%	5.09%
Net margin	31.69%	2.41%
ROE	16.34%	12.04%
ROIC	14.56%	8.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RMBS	SANM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.51%	12.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	17.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	18.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.88%	41.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RMBS or SANM?: SANM has the lower trailing P/E: RMBS trades at 51.36 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RMBS or SANM?: Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 22.51% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.
Is RMBS or SANM more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.69% versus SANM at 2.41%.
How have RMBS and SANM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, RMBS delivered 23.98% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RMBS analysis Full SANM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Rambus P/E ratio Sanmina P/E ratio Rambus ROE Sanmina ROE Rambus operating margin Sanmina operating margin Rambus revenue growth Sanmina revenue growth Rambus free cash flow Sanmina free cash flow

Rambus & Sanmina appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.