Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
RL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ralph Lauren Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$411.16Consumer Cyclical
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$239.19Consumer Cyclical
Total return — RL vs WSM
growth of $100 · last 29yRL +1205.3%WSM +5055.0%WSM compounded faster
RL WSM
RL vs WSM: by the numbers
- •WSM is the larger company ($28.14B vs $25.08B market cap).
- •WSM trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.78 vs 27.21 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 11.60% net margin).
- •RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 1.55% CAGR).
- •WSM pays the higher dividend yield (1.27% vs 0.97%).
Which is better, RL or WSM?
Metric tally: RL 9 · WSM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWSM(higher dividend yield)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RL | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.21 | 26.78 |
| Forward P/E | 22.42● | 27.47 |
| P/S ratio | 3.16● | 3.64 |
| P/B ratio | 9.02● | 15.34 |
| PEG ratio | 0.71● | 42.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.85 | 16.24● |
| FCF yield | 2.91% | 3.82%● |
Profitability
| Metric | RL | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 69.87%● | 46.06% |
| Operating margin | 14.53% | 17.97%● |
| Net margin | 11.60% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 33.13% | 58.22%● |
| ROIC | 19.62% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | RL | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.27%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.94% | 33.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RL | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.01%● | 1.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.37%● | 15.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.25%● | -3.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 30.26%● | 26.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RL or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WSM (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 7.
- Is RL or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WSM is cheaper: RL trades at a 27.21 P/E and WSM at 26.78.
- Which has grown faster, RL or WSM?
- Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — RL at a 13.01% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
- Does RL or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- RL yields 0.97% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RL or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — RL at 11.60% versus WSM at 13.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, RL or WSM?
- Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — RL at 18.79% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ralph Lauren P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioRalph Lauren dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldRalph Lauren ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROERalph Lauren operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginRalph Lauren revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthRalph Lauren free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
Ralph Lauren & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.