Rio Tinto Group (RIO) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
RIO leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Rio Tinto Group and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
$93.74Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$344.07Basic Materials
Total return — RIO vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 30yRIO +522.4%SHW +4339.6%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
RIO SHW
RIO vs SHW: by the numbers
- •RIO is the larger company ($152.24B vs $84.86B market cap).
- •RIO trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.12 vs 33.02 P/E).
- •RIO converts more revenue to profit (19.28% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •RIO pays the higher dividend yield (5.42% vs 0.93%).
Which is better, RIO or SHW?
Metric tally: RIO 10 · SHW 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRIO(lower P/E)
IncomeRIO(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 7.12● | 33.02 |
| Forward P/E | 10.76● | 29.35 |
| P/S ratio | 1.38● | 3.57 |
| P/B ratio | 2.47● | 19.26 |
| PEG ratio | 19.77 | 4.90● |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.06● | 22.10 |
| FCF yield | 7.01%● | 3.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.57% | 49.12%● |
| Operating margin | 27.10%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 19.28%● | 10.86% |
| ROE | 34.53% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 9.18% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.42%● | 0.93% |
| Payout ratio | 82.60% | 30.83% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.92% | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.36% | 6.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.74% | -2.44%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.24%● | 5.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RIO or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: RIO (lower P/E); income: RIO (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RIO leads 10 to 6.
- Is RIO or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RIO is cheaper: RIO trades at a 7.12 P/E and SHW at 33.02.
- Which has grown faster, RIO or SHW?
- Over the past five years, RIO grew revenue faster — RIO at a 4.92% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does RIO or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- RIO yields 5.42% and SHW yields 0.93% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RIO or SHW more profitable?
- RIO runs the higher net margin — RIO at 19.28% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, RIO or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, RIO delivered the higher annualized total return — RIO at 21.31% versus SHW at 14.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Rio Tinto P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioRio Tinto dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldRio Tinto ROESherwin-Williams ROERio Tinto operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginRio Tinto revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthRio Tinto free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Rio Tinto & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.