Which has grown faster, RGP or TUSK?

Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with RGP's decline the smaller — RGP at a -6.41% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.

Does RGP or TUSK pay a bigger dividend?

RGP pays a dividend (7.47% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is RGP or TUSK more profitable?

TUSK runs the higher net margin — RGP at -8.98% versus TUSK at 1.23%.

How have RGP and TUSK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, RGP delivered -21.96% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)

A side-by-side comparison of Resources Connection, Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

RGP

Resources Connection, Inc.

$128M

$3.71IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

TUSK

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

$141M

$2.92IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

Total return — RGP vs TUSK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

RGP -56.3% (-7.9%/yr)TUSK -78.1% (-14.1%/yr)RGP compounded faster over this window

RGP TUSK

RGP vs TUSK: by the numbers

•TUSK is the larger company ($141M vs $128M market cap).
•TUSK is profitable (1.23% net margin) while RGP runs a net loss (-8.98%).
•Both shrank revenue over the past five years; RGP's decline was smaller (-6.41% vs -25.88% CAGR).
•RGP pays a dividend (7.47% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RGP	TUSK
P/E ratio	N/A	197.30
P/S ratio	0.28	2.33
P/B ratio	0.75	0.54
FCF yield	0.27%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	RGP	TUSK
Gross margin	37.54%	-19.33%
Operating margin	-7.33%	-63.52%
Net margin	-8.98%	1.23%
ROE	-23.91%	0.28%
ROIC	-17.43%	-8.10%

Dividends

Metric	RGP	TUSK
Dividend yield	7.47%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RGP	TUSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.41%	-25.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-60.49%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.96%	-2.17%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, RGP or TUSK?: Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with RGP's decline the smaller — RGP at a -6.41% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.
Does RGP or TUSK pay a bigger dividend?: RGP pays a dividend (7.47% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is RGP or TUSK more profitable?: TUSK runs the higher net margin — RGP at -8.98% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
How have RGP and TUSK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, RGP delivered -21.96% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RGP analysis Full TUSK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mammoth Energy Services P/E ratio Resources Connection dividend yield Resources Connection ROE Mammoth Energy Services ROE Resources Connection operating margin Mammoth Energy Services operating margin Resources Connection revenue growth Mammoth Energy Services revenue growth Resources Connection free cash flow Mammoth Energy Services free cash flow

Resources Connection & Mammoth Energy Services appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.