Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW)
RF leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though TROW is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
$29.29Financial Services
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
$105.20Financial Services
Total return — RF vs TROW
growth of $100 · last 30yRF +56.3%TROW +1470.4%TROW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
RF TROW
RF vs TROW: by the numbers
- •RF is the larger company ($25.00B vs $22.54B market cap).
- •TROW trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.28 vs 12.20 P/E).
- •TROW converts more revenue to profit (28.28% vs 23.13% net margin).
- •RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 2.43% CAGR).
- •TROW pays the higher dividend yield (4.89% vs 3.62%).
Which is better, RF or TROW?
Metric tally: RF 8 · TROW 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTROW(lower P/E)
GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTROW(higher dividend yield)
QualityRF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RF | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.20 | 11.28● |
| Forward P/E | 11.19 | 11.09 |
| P/S ratio | 2.64● | 3.17 |
| P/B ratio | 1.35● | 2.18 |
| PEG ratio | 0.62● | 12.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | RF | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.81%● | 69.05% |
| Operating margin | 29.48% | 30.18%● |
| Net margin | 23.13% | 28.28%● |
| ROE | 11.85% | 19.44%● |
| ROIC | 13.79%● | 11.51% |
Dividends
| Metric | RF | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.62% | 4.89%● |
| Payout ratio | 45.89% | 55.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RF | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.48%● | 2.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.53%● | -1.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.43%● | -7.69% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RF or TROW?
- It depends on your goal. value: TROW (lower P/E); growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TROW (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 8 to 5.
- Is RF or TROW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TROW is cheaper: RF trades at a 12.20 P/E and TROW at 11.28.
- Which has grown faster, RF or TROW?
- Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus TROW at 2.43%.
- Does RF or TROW pay a bigger dividend?
- RF yields 3.62% and TROW yields 4.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RF or TROW more profitable?
- TROW runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus TROW at 28.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, RF or TROW?
- Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.11% versus TROW at 8.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Regions Financial P/E ratioT. Rowe Price P/E ratioRegions Financial dividend yieldT. Rowe Price dividend yieldRegions Financial ROET. Rowe Price ROERegions Financial operating marginT. Rowe Price operating marginRegions Financial revenue growthT. Rowe Price revenue growthRegions Financial free cash flowT. Rowe Price free cash flow
Regions Financial & T. Rowe Price appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.