Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF)
RF and RJF are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and Raymond James Financial, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
$28.62Financial Services
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$155.86Financial Services
Total return — RF vs RJF
growth of $100 · last 30yRF +52.7%RJF +5095.3%RJF compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
RF RJF
RF vs RJF: by the numbers
- •RJF is the larger company ($30.37B vs $24.42B market cap).
- •RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.93 vs 14.72 P/E).
- •RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 13.13% net margin).
- •RJF grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.83% vs 7.48% CAGR).
- •RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 1.33%).
Which is better, RF or RJF?
Metric tally: RF 7 · RJF 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRF(lower P/E)
GrowthRJF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)
QualityRJF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RF | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.93● | 14.72 |
| Forward P/E | 10.94● | 13.12 |
| P/S ratio | 2.58 | 1.90● |
| P/B ratio | 1.32● | 2.47 |
| PEG ratio | 0.62● | 2.76 |
Profitability
| Metric | RF | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.81% | 89.16%● |
| Operating margin | 29.48%● | 16.86% |
| Net margin | 23.13%● | 13.13% |
| ROE | 11.85% | 17.08%● |
| ROIC | 13.79% | 15.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | RF | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.70%● | 1.33% |
| Payout ratio | 45.89% | 19.75% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RF | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.48% | 13.83%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.53% | 21.61%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.70% | 15.14%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RF or RJF?
- It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: RJF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RJF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is RF or RJF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: RF trades at a 11.93 P/E and RJF at 14.72.
- Which has grown faster, RF or RJF?
- Over the past five years, RJF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus RJF at 13.83%.
- Does RF or RJF pay a bigger dividend?
- RF yields 3.70% and RJF yields 1.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RF or RJF more profitable?
- RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus RJF at 13.13%.
- Which has been the better investment, RF or RJF?
- Over the past 10-year, RJF delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.29% versus RJF at 17.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Regions Financial P/E ratioRaymond James Financial P/E ratioRegions Financial dividend yieldRaymond James Financial dividend yieldRegions Financial ROERaymond James Financial ROERegions Financial operating marginRaymond James Financial operating marginRegions Financial revenue growthRaymond James Financial revenue growthRegions Financial free cash flowRaymond James Financial free cash flow
Regions Financial & Raymond James Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.