Which has the lower trailing P/E, RDWR or VISN?

VISN has the lower trailing P/E: RDWR trades at 80.72 and VISN at 6.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RDWR or VISN?

Over the past five years, RDWR grew revenue faster — RDWR at a 3.46% CAGR versus VISN at -19.27%.

Does RDWR or VISN pay a bigger dividend?

VISN pays a dividend (243.31% yield), while RDWR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is RDWR or VISN more profitable?

VISN runs the higher net margin — RDWR at 5.34% versus VISN at 8.97%.

How have RDWR and VISN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, RDWR delivered 8.61% and VISN delivered -3.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Radware Ltd. (RDWR) vs Vistance Networks, Inc. (VISN)

A side-by-side comparison of Radware Ltd. and Vistance Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

RDWR

Radware Ltd.

$1.32B

$30.64TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VISN

Vistance Networks, Inc.

$1.39B

$6.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — RDWR vs VISN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

RDWR +143.7% (+9.3%/yr)VISN -28.9% (-3.4%/yr)RDWR compounded faster over this window

RDWR VISN

RDWR vs VISN: by the numbers

•VISN is the larger company ($1.39B vs $1.32B market cap).
•VISN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.68 vs 80.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VISN converts more revenue to profit (8.97% vs 5.34% net margin).
•RDWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.46% vs -19.27% CAGR).
•VISN pays a dividend (243.31% yield), while RDWR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RDWR	VISN
P/E ratio	80.72	6.68
Forward P/E	25.18	7.24
PEG ratio	4.58	N/A
P/S ratio	4.16	0.47
P/B ratio	4.16	0.55
EV / EBITDA	48.96	2.43
FCF yield	2.54%	6.26%

Profitability

Metric	RDWR	VISN
Gross margin	80.81%	38.45%
Operating margin	4.54%	3.44%
Net margin	5.34%	8.97%
ROE	5.34%	10.51%
ROIC	2.22%	13.30%

Dividends

Metric	RDWR	VISN
Dividend yield	N/A	243.31%
Payout ratio	N/A	1630.43%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RDWR	VISN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.46%	-19.27%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.49%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-4.23%	-15.68%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.83%	13.01%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RDWR or VISN?: VISN has the lower trailing P/E: RDWR trades at 80.72 and VISN at 6.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RDWR or VISN?: Over the past five years, RDWR grew revenue faster — RDWR at a 3.46% CAGR versus VISN at -19.27%.
Does RDWR or VISN pay a bigger dividend?: VISN pays a dividend (243.31% yield), while RDWR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is RDWR or VISN more profitable?: VISN runs the higher net margin — RDWR at 5.34% versus VISN at 8.97%.
How have RDWR and VISN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, RDWR delivered 8.61% and VISN delivered -3.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RDWR analysis Full VISN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Radware P/E ratio Vistance Networks P/E ratio Vistance Networks dividend yield Radware ROE Vistance Networks ROE Radware operating margin Vistance Networks operating margin Radware revenue growth Vistance Networks revenue growth Radware free cash flow Vistance Networks free cash flow

Radware & Vistance Networks appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.