Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
A side-by-side comparison of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: RCL is classified in Consumer Cyclical; WULF is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$260.14Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
$16.74Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — RCL vs WULF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yRCL +341.1% (+16.0%/yr)WULF +92.3% (+6.8%/yr)RCL compounded faster over this window
RCL WULF
RCL vs WULF: by the numbers
- •RCL is the larger company ($69.77B vs $8.30B market cap).
- •RCL is profitable (23.56% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
- •RCL grew revenue faster over the past five years (188.60% vs 73.75% CAGR).
- •RCL pays a dividend (1.92% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.08 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 14.65 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 3.73 | 50.22 |
| P/B ratio | 6.82 | 56.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.56 | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.64% | 50.93% |
| Operating margin | 27.32% | -101.10% |
| Net margin | 23.56% | -1179.94% |
| ROE | 43.01% | -1323.42% |
| ROIC | 14.59% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 30.90% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 188.60% | 73.75% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.81% | -27.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.57% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.76% | -6.00% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, RCL or WULF?
- Over the past five years, RCL grew revenue faster — RCL at a 188.60% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
- Does RCL or WULF pay a bigger dividend?
- RCL pays a dividend (1.92% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is RCL or WULF more profitable?
- RCL runs the higher net margin — RCL at 23.56% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
- How have RCL and WULF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, RCL delivered 16.06% and WULF delivered 7.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Royal Caribbean Cruises P/E ratioRoyal Caribbean Cruises dividend yieldRoyal Caribbean Cruises ROETeraWulf ROERoyal Caribbean Cruises operating marginTeraWulf operating marginRoyal Caribbean Cruises revenue growthTeraWulf revenue growthRoyal Caribbean Cruises free cash flow
Royal Caribbean Cruises & TeraWulf appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.