Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
A side-by-side comparison of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: RCL is classified in Consumer Cyclical; WULF is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$323.58Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
$15.09TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — RCL vs WULF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yRCL +3924.9%WULF +681.1%RCL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
RCL WULF
RCL vs WULF: by the numbers
- •RCL is the larger company ($86.78B vs $7.48B market cap).
- •RCL is profitable (23.56% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
- •RCL grew revenue faster over the past five years (188.60% vs 66.83% CAGR).
- •RCL pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.93 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 18.44 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 4.66 | 43.01 |
| P/B ratio | 8.51 | 48.38 |
| PEG ratio | 0.41 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.10 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 1.66% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.64% | 50.93% |
| Operating margin | 27.32% | -101.10% |
| Net margin | 23.56% | -611.46% |
| ROE | 43.01% | -470.94% |
| ROIC | 14.90% | -3.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 31.79% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RCL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 188.60% | 66.83% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.81% | -27.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.57% | -2.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 32.88% | -0.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, RCL or WULF?
- Over the past five years, RCL grew revenue faster — RCL at a 188.60% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
- Does RCL or WULF pay a bigger dividend?
- RCL pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is RCL or WULF more profitable?
- RCL runs the higher net margin — RCL at 23.56% versus WULF at -611.46%.
- How have RCL and WULF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, RCL delivered 17.37% and WULF delivered 4.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Royal Caribbean Cruises P/E ratioTeraWulf P/E ratioRoyal Caribbean Cruises dividend yieldTeraWulf dividend yieldRoyal Caribbean Cruises ROETeraWulf ROERoyal Caribbean Cruises operating marginTeraWulf operating marginRoyal Caribbean Cruises revenue growthTeraWulf revenue growthRoyal Caribbean Cruises free cash flowTeraWulf free cash flow
Royal Caribbean Cruises & TeraWulf appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.