RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of RBC Bearings Incorporated and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
$648.89Industrials
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$400.95Industrials
Total return — RBC vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 21yRBC +2038.0%SNA +1017.5%RBC compounded faster
RBC SNA
RBC vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($20.77B vs $20.53B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 71.39 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 15.37% net margin).
- •RBC grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.93% vs 5.87% CAGR).
- •SNA pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, RBC or SNA?
Metric tally: RBC 3 · SNA 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthRBC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySNA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RBC | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 71.39 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | 53.30 | 20.98● |
| P/S ratio | 11.00 | 4.13● |
| P/B ratio | 6.12 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 3.27 | 1.87● |
| EV / EBITDA | 39.57 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 1.67% | 5.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | RBC | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.37% | 51.30%● |
| Operating margin | 22.50% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 15.37% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 8.56% | 17.18%● |
| ROIC | 6.88% | 13.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | RBC | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.36% |
| Payout ratio | — | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RBC | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.93%● | 5.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.16% | 11.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.21%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.52%● | 15.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RBC or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: RBC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SNA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 13 to 3.
- Is RBC or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: RBC trades at a 71.39 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, RBC or SNA?
- Over the past five years, RBC grew revenue faster — RBC at a 22.93% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does RBC or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- SNA pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.
- Is RBC or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — RBC at 15.37% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, RBC or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, RBC delivered the higher annualized total return — RBC at 28.07% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
RBC Bearings P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioRBC Bearings dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldRBC Bearings ROESnap-on ROERBC Bearings operating marginSnap-on operating marginRBC Bearings revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthRBC Bearings free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
RBC Bearings & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.