Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
WM leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Quanta Services, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — PWR vs WM
growth of $100 · last 28yPWR +9071.6%WM +525.4%PWR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
PWR WM
PWR vs WM: by the numbers
- •PWR is the larger company ($103.22B vs $90.57B market cap).
- •WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (32.64 vs 94.36 P/E).
- •WM converts more revenue to profit (10.99% vs 3.72% net margin).
- •PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, PWR or WM?
Metric tally: PWR 5 · WM 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWM(lower P/E)
GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)
QualityWM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PWR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 94.36 | 32.64● |
| Forward P/E | 41.98 | 24.48● |
| P/S ratio | 3.49● | 3.59 |
| P/B ratio | 11.57 | 9.10● |
| PEG ratio | 5.33 | 2.39● |
| EV / EBITDA | 46.58 | 14.85● |
| FCF yield | 1.61% | 3.61%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PWR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 13.59% | 32.06%● |
| Operating margin | 5.76% | 18.46%● |
| Net margin | 3.72% | 10.99%● |
| ROE | 12.33% | 27.88%● |
| ROIC | 7.07% | 8.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PWR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 1.68%● |
| Payout ratio | 6.40% | 56.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PWR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 21.91%● | 10.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.88%● | 13.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 17.91%● | 7.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 49.66%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PWR or WM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WM (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: WM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WM leads 12 to 5.
- Is PWR or WM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: PWR trades at a 94.36 P/E and WM at 32.64.
- Which has grown faster, PWR or WM?
- Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 21.91% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
- Does PWR or WM pay a bigger dividend?
- PWR yields 0.06% and WM yields 1.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PWR or WM more profitable?
- WM runs the higher net margin — PWR at 3.72% versus WM at 10.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, PWR or WM?
- Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — PWR at 40.72% versus WM at 15.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Quanta Services P/E ratioWaste Management P/E ratioQuanta Services dividend yieldWaste Management dividend yieldQuanta Services ROEWaste Management ROEQuanta Services operating marginWaste Management operating marginQuanta Services revenue growthWaste Management revenue growthQuanta Services free cash flowWaste Management free cash flow
Quanta Services & Waste Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.