Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWR or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: PWR trades at 77.60 and WM at 31.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PWR or WM?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 23.02% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does PWR or WM pay a bigger dividend?

PWR yields 0.06% and WM yields 1.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PWR or WM more profitable?

WM runs the higher net margin — PWR at 4.08% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have PWR and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PWR delivered 38.85% and WM delivered 15.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Quanta Services, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$101.84B

$677.41IndustrialsAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Waste Management, Inc.

$89.97B

$225.08IndustrialsAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — PWR vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PWR +2534.7% (+38.7%/yr)WM +314.8% (+15.3%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PWR WM

PWR vs WM: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($101.84B vs $89.97B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.88 vs 77.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WM converts more revenue to profit (11.12% vs 4.08% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs 9.22% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 0.06%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PWR	WM
P/E ratio	77.60	31.88
Forward P/E	43.56	27.73
P/S ratio	3.15	3.54
P/B ratio	10.71	9.15
EV / EBITDA	36.49	14.62
FCF yield	2.32%	3.94%

Profitability

Metric	PWR	WM
Gross margin	14.42%	35.04%
Operating margin	6.20%	18.54%
Net margin	4.08%	11.12%
ROE	13.88%	28.74%
ROIC	8.49%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	PWR	WM
Dividend yield	0.06%	1.57%
Payout ratio	6.26%	52.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PWR	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.02%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.88%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	42.82%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	48.09%	9.92%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWR or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: PWR trades at 77.60 and WM at 31.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PWR or WM?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 23.02% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does PWR or WM pay a bigger dividend?: PWR yields 0.06% and WM yields 1.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PWR or WM more profitable?: WM runs the higher net margin — PWR at 4.08% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have PWR and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PWR delivered 38.85% and WM delivered 15.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PWR analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Quanta Services P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Quanta Services dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Quanta Services ROE Waste Management ROE Quanta Services operating margin Waste Management operating margin Quanta Services revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Quanta Services free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Quanta Services & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.