Is PWR or TT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TT is cheaper: PWR trades at a 96.34 P/E and TT at 36.69.

Which has grown faster, PWR or TT?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 21.91% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.

Does PWR or TT pay a bigger dividend?

PWR yields 0.06% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PWR or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — PWR at 3.72% versus TT at 13.42%.

Which has been the better investment, PWR or TT?

Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — PWR at 40.38% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

TT leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Quanta Services, Inc. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$105.39B

$702.29Industrials

Trane Technologies plc

$104.86B

$474.34Industrials

Total return — PWR vs TT

growth of $100 · last 28y

PWR +9263.9%TT +2624.5%PWR compounded faster

PWR TT

PWR vs TT: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($105.39B vs $104.86B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.69 vs 96.34 P/E).
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.42% vs 3.72% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 10.98% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.84% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, PWR or TT?

Metric tally: PWR 5 · TT 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTT(lower P/E)

GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeTT(higher dividend yield)

QualityTT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PWR	TT
P/E ratio	96.34	36.69●
Forward P/E	42.86	27.87●
P/S ratio	3.56●	4.90
P/B ratio	11.81●	12.29
PEG ratio	5.33	2.06●
EV / EBITDA	46.89	25.64●
FCF yield	1.57%	2.99%●

Profitability

Metric	PWR	TT
Gross margin	13.59%	35.92%●
Operating margin	5.76%	18.17%●
Net margin	3.72%	13.42%●
ROE	12.33%	33.65%●
ROIC	7.07%	20.26%●

Dividends

Metric	PWR	TT
Dividend yield	0.06%	0.84%●
Payout ratio	6.11%	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PWR	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	21.91%●	10.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.88%	29.75%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.91%●	11.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	51.14%●	22.96%

Frequently asked

Which is better, PWR or TT?: It depends on your goal. value: TT (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TT (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 12 to 5.
Is PWR or TT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TT is cheaper: PWR trades at a 96.34 P/E and TT at 36.69.
Which has grown faster, PWR or TT?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 21.91% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.
Does PWR or TT pay a bigger dividend?: PWR yields 0.06% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PWR or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — PWR at 3.72% versus TT at 13.42%.
Which has been the better investment, PWR or TT?: Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — PWR at 40.38% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PWR analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Quanta Services P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Quanta Services dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Quanta Services ROE Trane Technologies ROE Quanta Services operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Quanta Services revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Quanta Services free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Quanta Services & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.