Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWR or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: PWR trades at 73.61 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PWR or TT?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 23.02% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does PWR or TT pay a bigger dividend?

PWR yields 0.07% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PWR or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — PWR at 4.08% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have PWR and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PWR delivered 38.60% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Quanta Services, Inc. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$96.61B

$642.63IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$96.33B

$437.82IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PWR vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PWR +2348.2% (+37.7%/yr)TT +956.2% (+26.6%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

PWR TT

PWR vs TT: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($96.61B vs $96.33B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.19 vs 73.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.28% vs 4.08% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs 10.44% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PWR	TT
P/E ratio	73.61	33.19
Forward P/E	38.41	28.66
P/S ratio	2.95	4.34
P/B ratio	10.02	11.14
EV / EBITDA	34.27	22.77
FCF yield	2.47%	3.73%

Profitability

Metric	PWR	TT
Gross margin	14.42%	35.39%
Operating margin	6.20%	17.94%
Net margin	4.08%	13.28%
ROE	13.88%	34.11%
ROIC	8.49%	19.89%

Dividends

Metric	PWR	TT
Dividend yield	0.07%	0.92%
Payout ratio	4.93%	31.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PWR	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.02%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.88%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	42.82%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	41.43%	19.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWR or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: PWR trades at 73.61 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PWR or TT?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 23.02% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does PWR or TT pay a bigger dividend?: PWR yields 0.07% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PWR or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — PWR at 4.08% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have PWR and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PWR delivered 38.60% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PWR analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Quanta Services P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Quanta Services dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Quanta Services ROE Trane Technologies ROE Quanta Services operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Quanta Services revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Quanta Services free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Quanta Services & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.