Phillips 66 (PSX) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
XOM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though PSX is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Phillips 66 and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — PSX vs XOM
growth of $100 · last 14yPSX +427.8%XOM +75.8%PSX compounded faster
PSX XOM
PSX vs XOM: by the numbers
- •XOM is the larger company ($609.33B vs $71.95B market cap).
- •PSX trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.68 vs 24.79 P/E).
- •XOM converts more revenue to profit (7.76% vs 3.04% net margin).
- •PSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.79% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •XOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.78% vs 2.75%).
Which is better, PSX or XOM?
Metric tally: PSX 7 · XOM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePSX(lower P/E)
GrowthPSX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityXOM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | PSX | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.68● | 24.79 |
| Forward P/E | 10.53● | 14.15 |
| P/S ratio | 0.53● | 1.89 |
| P/B ratio | 2.54 | 2.42● |
| PEG ratio | 0.10● | 2.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.27● | 10.82 |
| FCF yield | 0.16% | 3.06%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PSX | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.04% | 25.49%● |
| Operating margin | 4.67% | 9.01%● |
| Net margin | 3.04% | 7.76%● |
| ROE | 14.45%● | 9.95% |
| ROIC | 4.75% | 6.34%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PSX | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.75% | 2.78% |
| Payout ratio | 45.57% | 61.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PSX | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.79%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.08% | 12.08%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -16.26% | 36.20%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.98% | 23.23%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PSX or XOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PSX (lower P/E); growth: PSX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: XOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, XOM leads 9 to 7.
- Is PSX or XOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PSX is cheaper: PSX trades at a 17.68 P/E and XOM at 24.79.
- Which has grown faster, PSX or XOM?
- Over the past five years, PSX grew revenue faster — PSX at a 15.79% CAGR versus XOM at 12.49%.
- Does PSX or XOM pay a bigger dividend?
- PSX yields 2.75% and XOM yields 2.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PSX or XOM more profitable?
- XOM runs the higher net margin — PSX at 3.04% versus XOM at 7.76%.
- Which has been the better investment, PSX or XOM?
- Over the past 10-year, PSX delivered the higher annualized total return — PSX at 12.55% versus XOM at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Phillips 66 P/E ratioExxon Mobil P/E ratioPhillips 66 dividend yieldExxon Mobil dividend yieldPhillips 66 ROEExxon Mobil ROEPhillips 66 operating marginExxon Mobil operating marginPhillips 66 revenue growthExxon Mobil revenue growthPhillips 66 free cash flowExxon Mobil free cash flow
Phillips 66 & Exxon Mobil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.