Which has the lower trailing P/E, PSX or XOM?

PSX has the lower trailing P/E: PSX trades at 14.78 and XOM at 21.37. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PSX or XOM?

Over the past five years, PSX grew revenue faster — PSX at a 13.56% CAGR versus XOM at 10.96%.

Does PSX or XOM pay a bigger dividend?

PSX yields 1.92% and XOM yields 2.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PSX or XOM more profitable?

XOM runs the higher net margin — PSX at 4.62% versus XOM at 9.07%.

How have PSX and XOM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PSX delivered 17.13% and XOM delivered 11.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Phillips 66 (PSX) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Phillips 66 and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PSX

Phillips 66

$104.03B

$259.47EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

XOM

Exxon Mobil Corporation

$688.06B

$166.02EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PSX vs XOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PSX +390.0% (+17.2%/yr)XOM +186.8% (+11.1%/yr)PSX compounded faster over this window

PSX XOM

PSX vs XOM: by the numbers

•XOM is the larger company ($688.06B vs $104.03B market cap).
•PSX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.78 vs 21.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•XOM converts more revenue to profit (9.07% vs 4.62% net margin).
•PSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.56% vs 10.96% CAGR).
•XOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.51% vs 1.92%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PSX	XOM
P/E ratio	14.78	21.37
Forward P/E	9.89	14.26
P/S ratio	0.68	1.91
P/B ratio	3.30	2.65
EV / EBITDA	9.23	10.54
FCF yield	6.15%	4.44%

Profitability

Metric	PSX	XOM
Gross margin	9.78%	25.15%
Operating margin	6.67%	10.71%
Net margin	4.62%	9.07%
ROE	22.51%	12.63%
ROIC	12.71%	7.45%

Dividends

Metric	PSX	XOM
Dividend yield	1.92%	2.51%
Payout ratio	28.55%	53.02%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PSX	XOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.56%	10.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	8.08%	12.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	35.99%	14.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.23%	29.34%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PSX or XOM?: PSX has the lower trailing P/E: PSX trades at 14.78 and XOM at 21.37. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PSX or XOM?: Over the past five years, PSX grew revenue faster — PSX at a 13.56% CAGR versus XOM at 10.96%.
Does PSX or XOM pay a bigger dividend?: PSX yields 1.92% and XOM yields 2.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PSX or XOM more profitable?: XOM runs the higher net margin — PSX at 4.62% versus XOM at 9.07%.
How have PSX and XOM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PSX delivered 17.13% and XOM delivered 11.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PSX analysis Full XOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Phillips 66 P/E ratio Exxon Mobil P/E ratio Phillips 66 dividend yield Exxon Mobil dividend yield Phillips 66 ROE Exxon Mobil ROE Phillips 66 operating margin Exxon Mobil operating margin Phillips 66 revenue growth Exxon Mobil revenue growth Phillips 66 free cash flow Exxon Mobil free cash flow

Phillips 66 & Exxon Mobil appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.