Which has the lower trailing P/E, PLTR or SEZL?

SEZL has the lower trailing P/E: PLTR trades at 158.88 and SEZL at 23.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PLTR or SEZL?

Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — PLTR at a 35.90% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.

Is PLTR or SEZL more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — PLTR at 49.00% versus SEZL at 30.35%.

How have PLTR and SEZL total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PLTR delivered 44.77% and SEZL delivered 58.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) vs Sezzle Inc. (SEZL)

A side-by-side comparison of Palantir Technologies Inc. and Sezzle Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: PLTR is classified in Technology; SEZL is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$430.47B

$187.48TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SEZL

Sezzle Inc.

$3.64B

$108.30Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PLTR vs SEZL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

PLTR +1660.3% (+61.3%/yr)SEZL +1250.8% (+54.3%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

PLTR SEZL

PLTR vs SEZL: by the numbers

•PLTR is the larger company ($430.47B vs $3.64B market cap).
•SEZL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.65 vs 158.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 30.35% net margin).
•SEZL grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.22% vs 35.90% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PLTR	SEZL
P/E ratio	158.88	23.65
Forward P/E	117.02	20.65
P/S ratio	69.93	6.85
P/B ratio	44.04	15.63
EV / EBITDA	160.99	N/A
FCF yield	0.78%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	PLTR	SEZL
Gross margin	84.80%	90.80%
Operating margin	31.59%	40.39%
Net margin	49.00%	30.35%
ROE	30.86%	69.29%
ROIC	25.60%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PLTR	SEZL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	35.90%	42.22%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	122.48%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.77%	58.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PLTR or SEZL?: SEZL has the lower trailing P/E: PLTR trades at 158.88 and SEZL at 23.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PLTR or SEZL?: Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — PLTR at a 35.90% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.
Is PLTR or SEZL more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — PLTR at 49.00% versus SEZL at 30.35%.
How have PLTR and SEZL total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PLTR delivered 44.77% and SEZL delivered 58.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PLTR analysis Full SEZL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Sezzle P/E ratio Palantir Technologies ROE Sezzle ROE Palantir Technologies operating margin Sezzle operating margin Palantir Technologies revenue growth Sezzle revenue growth Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Palantir Technologies & Sezzle appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.