Which has the lower trailing P/E, PLTR or QCOM?

QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: PLTR trades at 141.72 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PLTR or QCOM?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — PLTR at a 35.90% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.

Does PLTR or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is PLTR or QCOM more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — PLTR at 49.00% versus QCOM at 21.01%.

How have PLTR and QCOM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PLTR delivered 45.36% and QCOM delivered 6.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Palantir Technologies Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$383.97B

$167.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$191.07B

$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PLTR vs QCOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

PLTR +1684.5% (+61.7%/yr)QCOM +70.4% (+9.3%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PLTR QCOM

PLTR vs QCOM: by the numbers

•PLTR is the larger company ($383.97B vs $191.07B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.77 vs 141.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 21.01% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 6.23% CAGR).
•QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PLTR	QCOM
P/E ratio	141.72	20.77
Forward P/E	104.86	17.26
P/S ratio	62.37	4.34
P/B ratio	39.28	6.91
EV / EBITDA	143.52	17.11
FCF yield	0.87%	5.45%

Profitability

Metric	PLTR	QCOM
Gross margin	84.80%	54.23%
Operating margin	31.59%	23.19%
Net margin	49.00%	21.01%
ROE	30.86%	33.48%
ROIC	25.60%	17.42%

Dividends

Metric	PLTR	QCOM
Dividend yield	N/A	2.05%
Payout ratio	N/A	41.32%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PLTR	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	35.90%	6.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	2.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	122.48%	2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.36%	6.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PLTR or QCOM?: QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: PLTR trades at 141.72 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PLTR or QCOM?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — PLTR at a 35.90% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
Does PLTR or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is PLTR or QCOM more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — PLTR at 49.00% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
How have PLTR and QCOM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PLTR delivered 45.36% and QCOM delivered 6.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PLTR analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Palantir Technologies P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio QUALCOMM dividend yield Palantir Technologies ROE QUALCOMM ROE Palantir Technologies operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Palantir Technologies revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Palantir Technologies free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Palantir Technologies & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.