Which has the lower trailing P/E, PKG or ULTA?

ULTA has the lower trailing P/E: PKG trades at 30.94 and ULTA at 20.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PKG or ULTA?

Over the past five years, ULTA grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.09% CAGR versus ULTA at 11.09%.

Does PKG or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?

PKG pays a dividend (2.24% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is PKG or ULTA more profitable?

ULTA runs the higher net margin — PKG at 7.25% versus ULTA at 9.34%.

How have PKG and ULTA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PKG delivered 14.78% and ULTA delivered 8.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)

A side-by-side comparison of Packaging Corporation of America and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PKG

Packaging Corporation of America

$21.23B

$238.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ULTA

Ulta Beauty, Inc.

$23.81B

$553.86Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PKG vs ULTA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PKG +275.9% (+14.2%/yr)ULTA +123.5% (+8.4%/yr)PKG compounded faster over this window

PKG ULTA

PKG vs ULTA: by the numbers

•ULTA is the larger company ($23.81B vs $21.23B market cap).
•ULTA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.16 vs 30.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ULTA converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 7.25% net margin).
•ULTA grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.09% vs 6.09% CAGR).
•PKG pays a dividend (2.24% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PKG	ULTA
P/E ratio	30.94	20.16
Forward P/E	22.68	19.11
P/S ratio	2.23	1.84
P/B ratio	4.55	9.01
EV / EBITDA	12.67	13.44
FCF yield	N/A	4.48%

Profitability

Metric	PKG	ULTA
Gross margin	20.11%	39.32%
Operating margin	12.72%	12.56%
Net margin	7.25%	9.34%
ROE	14.82%	45.77%
ROIC	9.27%	23.11%

Dividends

Metric	PKG	ULTA
Dividend yield	2.24%	N/A
Payout ratio	68.18%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PKG	ULTA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.09%	11.09%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.04%	52.46%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.56%	0.06%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.32%	7.24%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PKG or ULTA?: ULTA has the lower trailing P/E: PKG trades at 30.94 and ULTA at 20.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PKG or ULTA?: Over the past five years, ULTA grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.09% CAGR versus ULTA at 11.09%.
Does PKG or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?: PKG pays a dividend (2.24% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is PKG or ULTA more profitable?: ULTA runs the higher net margin — PKG at 7.25% versus ULTA at 9.34%.
How have PKG and ULTA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PKG delivered 14.78% and ULTA delivered 8.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PKG analysis Full ULTA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Packaging Corporation of America P/E ratio Ulta Beauty P/E ratio Packaging Corporation of America dividend yield Packaging Corporation of America ROE Ulta Beauty ROE Packaging Corporation of America operating margin Ulta Beauty operating margin Packaging Corporation of America revenue growth Ulta Beauty revenue growth Packaging Corporation of America free cash flow Ulta Beauty free cash flow

Packaging Corporation of America & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.