Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) vs SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)
SN leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Packaging Corporation of America and SharkNinja, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
$232.83Consumer Cyclical
SN
SharkNinja, Inc.
$134.90Consumer Cyclical
Total return — PKG vs SN
growth of $100 · last 3yPKG +51.8%SN +218.8%SN compounded faster
PKG SN
PKG vs SN: by the numbers
- •PKG is the larger company ($20.74B vs $19.09B market cap).
- •SN trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.20 vs 28.32 P/E).
- •SN converts more revenue to profit (10.70% vs 8.03% net margin).
- •SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs 6.41% CAGR).
- •PKG pays a dividend (2.25% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, PKG or SN?
Metric tally: PKG 4 · SN 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSN(lower P/E)
GrowthSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PKG | SN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.32 | 27.20● |
| Forward P/E | 22.50 | 19.28● |
| P/S ratio | 2.25● | 2.91 |
| P/B ratio | 4.52● | 6.95 |
| PEG ratio | 2.34 | 0.39● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.31● | 18.14 |
| FCF yield | 3.39%● | 1.97% |
Profitability
| Metric | PKG | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.48% | 48.71%● |
| Operating margin | 13.16% | 14.37%● |
| Net margin | 8.03% | 10.70%● |
| ROE | 16.14% | 25.51%● |
| ROIC | 9.44% | 19.72%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PKG | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.25% | — |
| Payout ratio | 60.98% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PKG | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.41% | 18.38%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.12% | 16.16%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.94% | 15.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.92% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PKG or SN?
- It depends on your goal. value: SN (lower P/E); growth: SN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SN leads 11 to 4.
- Is PKG or SN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SN is cheaper: PKG trades at a 28.32 P/E and SN at 27.20.
- Which has grown faster, PKG or SN?
- Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.41% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.
- Does PKG or SN pay a bigger dividend?
- PKG pays a dividend (2.25% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
- Is PKG or SN more profitable?
- SN runs the higher net margin — PKG at 8.03% versus SN at 10.70%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Packaging Corporation of America P/E ratioSharkNinja P/E ratioPackaging Corporation of America dividend yieldSharkNinja dividend yieldPackaging Corporation of America ROESharkNinja ROEPackaging Corporation of America operating marginSharkNinja operating marginPackaging Corporation of America revenue growthSharkNinja revenue growthPackaging Corporation of America free cash flowSharkNinja free cash flow
Packaging Corporation of America & SharkNinja appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.