Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
RL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Packaging Corporation of America and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
$232.83Consumer Cyclical
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$407.01Consumer Cyclical
Total return — PKG vs RL
growth of $100 · last 26yPKG +1840.3%RL +2525.9%RL compounded faster
PKG RL
PKG vs RL: by the numbers
- •RL is the larger company ($24.83B vs $20.74B market cap).
- •RL trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.94 vs 28.32 P/E).
- •RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 8.03% net margin).
- •RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 6.41% CAGR).
- •PKG pays the higher dividend yield (2.25% vs 0.90%).
Which is better, PKG or RL?
Metric tally: PKG 5 · RL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRL(lower P/E)
GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePKG(higher dividend yield)
QualityRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PKG | RL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.32 | 26.94● |
| Forward P/E | 22.50 | 22.20 |
| P/S ratio | 2.25● | 3.12 |
| P/B ratio | 4.52● | 8.93 |
| PEG ratio | 2.34 | 0.71● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.31● | 18.68 |
| FCF yield | 3.39%● | 2.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | PKG | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.48% | 69.87%● |
| Operating margin | 13.16% | 14.53%● |
| Net margin | 8.03% | 11.60%● |
| ROE | 16.14% | 33.13%● |
| ROIC | 9.44% | 19.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PKG | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.25%● | 0.90% |
| Payout ratio | 60.98% | 23.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PKG | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.41% | 13.01%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.12% | 20.37%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.94% | 22.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.92% | 30.43%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PKG or RL?
- It depends on your goal. value: RL (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PKG (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 11 to 5.
- Is PKG or RL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: PKG trades at a 28.32 P/E and RL at 26.94.
- Which has grown faster, PKG or RL?
- Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.41% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
- Does PKG or RL pay a bigger dividend?
- PKG yields 2.25% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PKG or RL more profitable?
- RL runs the higher net margin — PKG at 8.03% versus RL at 11.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, PKG or RL?
- Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — PKG at 16.26% versus RL at 17.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Packaging Corporation of America P/E ratioRalph Lauren P/E ratioPackaging Corporation of America dividend yieldRalph Lauren dividend yieldPackaging Corporation of America ROERalph Lauren ROEPackaging Corporation of America operating marginRalph Lauren operating marginPackaging Corporation of America revenue growthRalph Lauren revenue growthPackaging Corporation of America free cash flowRalph Lauren free cash flow
Packaging Corporation of America & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.