Which has the lower trailing P/E, PKG or RL?

RL has the lower trailing P/E: PKG trades at 30.94 and RL at 21.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PKG or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.09% CAGR versus RL at 9.57%.

Does PKG or RL pay a bigger dividend?

PKG yields 2.24% and RL yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PKG or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — PKG at 7.25% versus RL at 11.76%.

How have PKG and RL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PKG delivered 14.78% and RL delivered 15.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

A side-by-side comparison of Packaging Corporation of America and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PKG

Packaging Corporation of America

$21.23B

$238.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$21.11B

$346.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PKG vs RL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PKG +287.7% (+14.5%/yr)RL +311.2% (+15.2%/yr)RL compounded faster over this window

PKG RL

PKG vs RL: by the numbers

•PKG is the larger company ($21.23B vs $21.11B market cap).
•RL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.82 vs 30.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.76% vs 7.25% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.57% vs 6.09% CAGR).
•PKG pays the higher dividend yield (2.24% vs 1.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PKG	RL
P/E ratio	30.94	21.82
Forward P/E	22.68	18.29
P/S ratio	2.23	2.53
P/B ratio	4.55	7.76
EV / EBITDA	12.67	15.09
FCF yield	N/A	4.94%

Profitability

Metric	PKG	RL
Gross margin	20.11%	70.27%
Operating margin	12.72%	14.94%
Net margin	7.25%	11.76%
ROE	14.82%	36.11%
ROIC	9.27%	17.08%

Dividends

Metric	PKG	RL
Dividend yield	2.24%	1.10%
Payout ratio	68.18%	23.57%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PKG	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.09%	9.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.04%	20.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.56%	12.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.32%	27.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PKG or RL?: RL has the lower trailing P/E: PKG trades at 30.94 and RL at 21.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PKG or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — PKG at a 6.09% CAGR versus RL at 9.57%.
Does PKG or RL pay a bigger dividend?: PKG yields 2.24% and RL yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PKG or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — PKG at 7.25% versus RL at 11.76%.
How have PKG and RL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PKG delivered 14.78% and RL delivered 15.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PKG analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Packaging Corporation of America P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Packaging Corporation of America dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Packaging Corporation of America ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Packaging Corporation of America operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Packaging Corporation of America revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Packaging Corporation of America free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Packaging Corporation of America & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.