PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
PHM leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of PulteGroup, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$137.61Consumer Cyclical
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$239.19Consumer Cyclical
Total return — PHM vs WSM
growth of $100 · last 30yPHM +3935.5%WSM +8008.1%WSM compounded faster
PHM WSM
PHM vs WSM: by the numbers
- •WSM is the larger company ($28.14B vs $26.21B market cap).
- •PHM trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.31 vs 26.78 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 12.14% net margin).
- •PHM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.97% vs 1.55% CAGR).
- •WSM pays the higher dividend yield (1.27% vs 0.76%).
Which is better, PHM or WSM?
Metric tally: PHM 10 · WSM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePHM(lower P/E)
GrowthPHM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWSM(higher dividend yield)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PHM | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.31● | 26.78 |
| Forward P/E | 13.76● | 27.47 |
| P/S ratio | 1.59● | 3.64 |
| P/B ratio | 2.06● | 15.34 |
| PEG ratio | 0.80● | 42.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.49● | 16.24 |
| FCF yield | 6.16%● | 3.82% |
Profitability
| Metric | PHM | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.06% | 46.06%● |
| Operating margin | 16.40% | 17.97%● |
| Net margin | 12.14% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 15.77% | 58.22%● |
| ROIC | 14.25% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PHM | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 1.27%● |
| Payout ratio | 9.28% | 33.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PHM | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.97%● | 1.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.65%● | 15.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.71%● | -3.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.90% | 26.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PHM or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PHM (lower P/E); growth: PHM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WSM (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PHM leads 10 to 7.
- Is PHM or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PHM is cheaper: PHM trades at a 13.31 P/E and WSM at 26.78.
- Which has grown faster, PHM or WSM?
- Over the past five years, PHM grew revenue faster — PHM at a 7.97% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
- Does PHM or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- PHM yields 0.76% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PHM or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — PHM at 12.14% versus WSM at 13.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, PHM or WSM?
- Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — PHM at 23.72% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
PulteGroup P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioPulteGroup dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldPulteGroup ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROEPulteGroup operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginPulteGroup revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthPulteGroup free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
PulteGroup & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.