PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) vs SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)
A side-by-side comparison of PulteGroup, Inc. and SharkNinja, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$119.28Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 3:10 PM EDT
SN
SharkNinja, Inc.
$167.81Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 3:10 PM EDT
Total return — PHM vs SN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yPHM +56.1% (+16.0%/yr)SN +288.8% (+57.2%/yr)SN compounded faster over this window
PHM SN
PHM vs SN: by the numbers
- •SN is the larger company ($23.75B vs $23.02B market cap).
- •PHM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.25 vs 34.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PHM converts more revenue to profit (11.62% vs 10.06% net margin).
- •SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs 6.04% CAGR).
- •PHM pays a dividend (0.85% yield), while SN is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PHM | SN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.25 | 34.25 |
| Forward P/E | 11.75 | 25.55 |
| P/S ratio | 1.40 | 3.44 |
| P/B ratio | 1.77 | 8.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.65 | 21.54 |
| FCF yield | 6.57% | 3.38% |
Profitability
| Metric | PHM | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.46% | 48.74% |
| Operating margin | 14.61% | 13.86% |
| Net margin | 11.62% | 10.06% |
| ROE | 14.65% | 24.45% |
| ROIC | 11.61% | 19.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | PHM | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 10.27% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PHM | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.04% | 18.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.65% | 16.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.22% | 15.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 20.95% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PHM or SN?
- PHM has the lower trailing P/E: PHM trades at 12.25 and SN at 34.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PHM or SN?
- Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — PHM at a 6.04% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.
- Does PHM or SN pay a bigger dividend?
- PHM pays a dividend (0.85% yield), while SN is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is PHM or SN more profitable?
- PHM runs the higher net margin — PHM at 11.62% versus SN at 10.06%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
PulteGroup P/E ratioSharkNinja P/E ratioPulteGroup dividend yieldPulteGroup ROESharkNinja ROEPulteGroup operating marginSharkNinja operating marginPulteGroup revenue growthSharkNinja revenue growthPulteGroup free cash flowSharkNinja free cash flow
PulteGroup & SharkNinja appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.