Is PHM or SN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PHM is cheaper: PHM trades at a 12.15 P/E and SN at 27.94.

Which has grown faster, PHM or SN?

Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — PHM at a 7.97% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.

Does PHM or SN pay a bigger dividend?

PHM pays a dividend (0.80% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.

Is PHM or SN more profitable?

PHM runs the higher net margin — PHM at 12.14% versus SN at 10.70%.

PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) vs SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)

PHM leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of PulteGroup, Inc. and SharkNinja, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

PHM

PulteGroup, Inc.

$23.93B

$125.62Consumer Cyclical

SharkNinja, Inc.

$19.35B

$138.56Consumer Cyclical

Total return — PHM vs SN

growth of $100 · last 3y

PHM +48.9%SN +227.5%SN compounded faster

PHM SN

PHM vs SN: by the numbers

•PHM is the larger company ($23.93B vs $19.35B market cap).
•PHM trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.15 vs 27.94 P/E).
•PHM converts more revenue to profit (12.14% vs 10.70% net margin).
•SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs 7.97% CAGR).
•PHM pays a dividend (0.80% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, PHM or SN?

Metric tally: PHM 9 · SN 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePHM(lower P/E)

GrowthSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PHM	SN
P/E ratio	12.15●	27.94
Forward P/E	12.56●	19.80
P/S ratio	1.45●	2.99
P/B ratio	1.88●	7.14
PEG ratio	0.73	0.39●
EV / EBITDA	8.94●	18.62
FCF yield	6.75%●	1.92%

Profitability

Metric	PHM	SN
Gross margin	26.06%	48.71%●
Operating margin	16.40%●	14.37%
Net margin	12.14%●	10.70%
ROE	15.77%	25.51%●
ROIC	14.25%	19.72%●

Dividends

Metric	PHM	SN
Dividend yield	0.80%	—
Payout ratio	8.92%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PHM	SN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.97%	18.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.65%●	16.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.71%	15.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.37%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, PHM or SN?: It depends on your goal. value: PHM (lower P/E); growth: SN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PHM leads 9 to 6.
Is PHM or SN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PHM is cheaper: PHM trades at a 12.15 P/E and SN at 27.94.
Which has grown faster, PHM or SN?: Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — PHM at a 7.97% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.
Does PHM or SN pay a bigger dividend?: PHM pays a dividend (0.80% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
Is PHM or SN more profitable?: PHM runs the higher net margin — PHM at 12.14% versus SN at 10.70%.

Go deeper

Full PHM analysis Full SN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

PulteGroup P/E ratio SharkNinja P/E ratio PulteGroup dividend yield SharkNinja dividend yield PulteGroup ROE SharkNinja ROE PulteGroup operating margin SharkNinja operating margin PulteGroup revenue growth SharkNinja revenue growth PulteGroup free cash flow SharkNinja free cash flow

PulteGroup & SharkNinja appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.