PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
RL leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though PHM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of PulteGroup, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$125.62Consumer Cyclical
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$410.92Consumer Cyclical
Total return — PHM vs RL
growth of $100 · last 29yPHM +2912.5%RL +1204.5%PHM compounded faster
PHM RL
PHM vs RL: by the numbers
- •RL is the larger company ($25.07B vs $23.93B market cap).
- •PHM trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.15 vs 27.20 P/E).
- •PHM converts more revenue to profit (12.14% vs 11.60% net margin).
- •RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 7.97% CAGR).
- •RL pays the higher dividend yield (0.89% vs 0.80%).
Which is better, PHM or RL?
Metric tally: PHM 8 · RL 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePHM(lower P/E)
GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRL(higher dividend yield)
QualityRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PHM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.15● | 27.20 |
| Forward P/E | 12.56● | 22.41 |
| P/S ratio | 1.45● | 3.15 |
| P/B ratio | 1.88● | 9.01 |
| PEG ratio | 0.73 | 0.71● |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.94● | 18.86 |
| FCF yield | 6.75%● | 2.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | PHM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.06% | 69.87%● |
| Operating margin | 16.40%● | 14.53% |
| Net margin | 12.14%● | 11.60% |
| ROE | 15.77% | 33.13%● |
| ROIC | 14.25% | 19.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PHM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.89%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.92% | 23.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PHM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.97% | 13.01%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.65% | 20.37%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.71% | 22.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 31.19%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PHM or RL?
- It depends on your goal. value: PHM (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RL (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 8.
- Is PHM or RL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PHM is cheaper: PHM trades at a 12.15 P/E and RL at 27.20.
- Which has grown faster, PHM or RL?
- Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — PHM at a 7.97% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
- Does PHM or RL pay a bigger dividend?
- PHM yields 0.80% and RL yields 0.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PHM or RL more profitable?
- PHM runs the higher net margin — PHM at 12.14% versus RL at 11.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, PHM or RL?
- Over the past 10-year, PHM delivered the higher annualized total return — PHM at 22.30% versus RL at 17.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
PulteGroup P/E ratioRalph Lauren P/E ratioPulteGroup dividend yieldRalph Lauren dividend yieldPulteGroup ROERalph Lauren ROEPulteGroup operating marginRalph Lauren operating marginPulteGroup revenue growthRalph Lauren revenue growthPulteGroup free cash flowRalph Lauren free cash flow
PulteGroup & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.