Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.79 and WM at 31.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or WM?

Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does PH or WM pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.79% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or WM more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have PH and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.62% and WM delivered 15.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 7, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$121.87B

$966.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

Waste Management, Inc.

$87.10B

$217.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

Total return — PH vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PH +824.2% (+24.9%/yr)WM +315.6% (+15.3%/yr)PH compounded faster over this window

PH WM

PH vs WM: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($121.87B vs $87.10B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.02 vs 33.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 11.12% net margin).
•WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.22% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.79%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	WM
P/E ratio	33.79	31.02
Forward P/E	30.75	27.00
P/S ratio	5.72	3.44
P/B ratio	7.99	8.90
EV / EBITDA	23.94	14.30
FCF yield	3.17%	4.05%

Profitability

Metric	PH	WM
Gross margin	37.69%	35.04%
Operating margin	21.55%	18.54%
Net margin	16.97%	11.12%
ROE	23.68%	28.74%
ROIC	13.94%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	PH	WM
Dividend yield	0.79%	1.62%
Payout ratio	26.68%	50.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.37%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.73%	8.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.79 and WM at 31.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or WM?: Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does PH or WM pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.79% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or WM more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have PH and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.62% and WM delivered 15.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Waste Management ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Waste Management operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Waste Management appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 7, 2026.