On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: PH trades at a 34.65 P/E and WM at 33.86.

Which has grown faster, PH or WM?

Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.

Does PH or WM pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.85% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or WM more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus WM at 10.99%.

Which has been the better investment, PH or WM?

Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.66% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

PH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though WM is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$119.68B

$949.17Industrials

Waste Management, Inc.

$93.03B

$231.67Industrials

Total return — PH vs WM

growth of $100 · last 30y

PH +5181.9%WM +731.6%PH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PH WM

PH vs WM: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($119.68B vs $93.03B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.86 vs 34.65 P/E).
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 10.99% net margin).
•WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 9.15% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.85%).

Which is better, PH or WM?

Metric tally: PH 9 · WM 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWM(lower P/E)

GrowthWM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)

QualityPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	WM
P/E ratio	34.65	33.86●
Forward P/E	30.01	28.59●
P/S ratio	5.73	3.72●
P/B ratio	8.23●	9.44
PEG ratio	1.04●	2.47
EV / EBITDA	24.36	15.30●
FCF yield	3.06%	3.48%●

Profitability

Metric	PH	WM
Gross margin	37.23%●	32.06%
Operating margin	20.87%●	18.46%
Net margin	16.58%●	10.99%
ROE	23.82%	27.88%●
ROIC	13.69%●	8.88%

Dividends

Metric	PH	WM
Dividend yield	0.85%	1.62%●
Payout ratio	29.07%	56.25%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.15%	10.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.00%●	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.25%●	7.28%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.69%●	12.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, PH or WM?: It depends on your goal. value: WM (lower P/E); growth: WM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 8.
Is PH or WM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: PH trades at a 34.65 P/E and WM at 33.86.
Which has grown faster, PH or WM?: Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
Does PH or WM pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.85% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or WM more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus WM at 10.99%.
Which has been the better investment, PH or WM?: Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.66% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Waste Management ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Waste Management operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.