Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or VRT?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 37.55 and VRT at 62.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — PH at a -16.70% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does PH or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.69% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or VRT more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have PH and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 26.24% and VRT delivered 59.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 7, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$136.27B

$1,080.76IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$105.68B

$274.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT

Total return — PH vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

PH +584.0%VRT +2736.5%VRT compounded faster

PH VRT

PH vs VRT: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($136.27B vs $105.68B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.55 vs 62.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 15.09% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs -16.70% CAGR).
•PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.69% vs 0.08%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	VRT
P/E ratio	37.55	62.88
Forward P/E	34.18	41.61
P/S ratio	6.36	9.51
P/B ratio	8.34	22.94
PEG ratio	1.04	0.28
EV / EBITDA	26.40	43.15
FCF yield	2.86%	2.68%

Profitability

Metric	PH	VRT
Gross margin	37.69%	37.52%
Operating margin	21.55%	19.12%
Net margin	16.97%	15.09%
ROE	22.26%	36.40%
ROIC	4.22%	18.55%

Dividends

Metric	PH	VRT
Dividend yield	0.69%	0.08%
Payout ratio	85.45%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-16.70%	18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.55%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	50.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.76%	59.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or VRT?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 37.55 and VRT at 62.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — PH at a -16.70% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does PH or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.69% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or VRT more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have PH and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 26.24% and VRT delivered 59.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Vertiv ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Vertiv operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Vertiv appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 7, 2026.