Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
PH leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$953.27Industrials
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$357.96Industrials
Total return — PH vs VRT
growth of $100 · last 8yPH +486.4%VRT +3534.1%VRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
PH VRT
PH vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($137.50B vs $121.02B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.18 vs 89.94 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 14.37% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 9.15% CAGR).
- •PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.78% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, PH or VRT?
Metric tally: PH 10 · VRT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePH(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePH(higher dividend yield)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PH | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.18● | 89.94 |
| Forward P/E | 28.00● | 40.70 |
| P/S ratio | 5.81● | 12.94 |
| P/B ratio | 8.35● | 33.07 |
| PEG ratio | 1.04 | 0.28● |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.30● | 60.77 |
| FCF yield | 3.01%● | 1.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.23%● | 36.16% |
| Operating margin | 20.87%● | 18.54% |
| Net margin | 16.58%● | 14.37% |
| ROE | 23.82% | 36.71%● |
| ROIC | 13.69% | 18.55%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.78%● | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.15% | 18.86%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.00% | 79.41%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 41.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.73% | 68.02%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PH or VRT?
- It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PH (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 10 to 7.
- Is PH or VRT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.18 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
- Which has grown faster, PH or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does PH or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.78% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or VRT more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, PH or VRT?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.74% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROEVertiv ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginVertiv operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthVertiv revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 22, 2026.