Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or VRT?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.83 and VRT at 57.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does PH or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.80% and VRT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or VRT more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have PH and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 28.92% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$121.51B

$963.72IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$97.81B

$254.05IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

Total return — PH vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

PH +580.1% (+27.1%/yr)VRT +2582.9% (+50.9%/yr)VRT compounded faster over this window

PH VRT

PH vs VRT: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($121.51B vs $97.81B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.83 vs 57.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 15.09% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.80% vs 0.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	VRT
P/E ratio	33.83	57.48
Forward P/E	27.43	37.78
P/S ratio	5.65	8.52
P/B ratio	7.89	20.56
EV / EBITDA	23.67	38.68
FCF yield	3.21%	2.99%

Profitability

Metric	PH	VRT
Gross margin	37.69%	37.52%
Operating margin	21.55%	19.12%
Net margin	16.97%	15.09%
ROE	23.68%	36.40%
ROIC	13.94%	20.78%

Dividends

Metric	PH	VRT
Dividend yield	0.80%	0.09%
Payout ratio	26.68%	5.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.37%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	50.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.92%	60.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or VRT?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.83 and VRT at 57.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does PH or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.80% and VRT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or VRT more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have PH and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 28.92% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Vertiv ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Vertiv operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Vertiv appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.