Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
UNP leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$903.48Industrials
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$272.70Industrials
Total return — PH vs UNP
growth of $100 · last 30yPH +4872.4%UNP +2250.9%PH compounded faster
PH UNP
PH vs UNP: by the numbers
- •UNP is the larger company ($161.91B vs $113.92B market cap).
- •UNP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.46 vs 33.34 P/E).
- •UNP converts more revenue to profit (29.20% vs 16.58% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 5.05% CAGR).
- •UNP pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, PH or UNP?
Metric tally: PH 8 · UNP 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUNP(lower P/E)
GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUNP(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | PH | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.34 | 22.46● |
| Forward P/E | 26.53 | 19.87● |
| P/S ratio | 5.51● | 6.55 |
| P/B ratio | 7.92● | 8.34 |
| PEG ratio | 1.04● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.16 | 14.73● |
| FCF yield | 3.18% | 3.52%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.23% | 45.67%● |
| Operating margin | 20.87% | 40.09%● |
| Net margin | 16.58% | 29.20%● |
| ROE | 23.82% | 37.15%● |
| ROIC | 13.69%● | 11.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 2.02%● |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 45.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.15%● | 5.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.00%● | 8.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.25%● | 0.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.11%● | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PH or UNP?
- It depends on your goal. value: UNP (lower P/E); growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UNP (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UNP leads 9 to 8.
- Is PH or UNP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UNP is cheaper: PH trades at a 33.34 P/E and UNP at 22.46.
- Which has grown faster, PH or UNP?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus UNP at 5.05%.
- Does PH or UNP pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.82% and UNP yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or UNP more profitable?
- UNP runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus UNP at 29.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, PH or UNP?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.01% versus UNP at 14.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioUnion Pacific P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldUnion Pacific dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROEUnion Pacific ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginUnion Pacific operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthUnion Pacific revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowUnion Pacific free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & Union Pacific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.