Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 34.09 and TT at 33.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does PH or TT pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.80% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or TT more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have PH and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.74% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$122.46B

$971.21IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 23, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$96.20B

$437.23IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 23, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — PH vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PH +820.9% (+24.9%/yr)TT +956.2% (+26.6%/yr)TT compounded faster over this window

PH TT

PH vs TT: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($122.46B vs $96.20B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.15 vs 34.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 13.28% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.44% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.80%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	TT
P/E ratio	34.09	33.15
Forward P/E	27.65	28.63
P/S ratio	5.70	4.33
P/B ratio	7.95	11.13
EV / EBITDA	23.84	22.74
FCF yield	3.19%	3.73%

Profitability

Metric	PH	TT
Gross margin	37.69%	35.39%
Operating margin	21.55%	17.94%
Net margin	16.97%	13.28%
ROE	23.68%	34.11%
ROIC	13.94%	19.89%

Dividends

Metric	PH	TT
Dividend yield	0.80%	0.92%
Payout ratio	26.68%	31.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.37%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.92%	19.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 34.09 and TT at 33.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does PH or TT pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.80% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or TT more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have PH and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.74% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Trane Technologies ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.