Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 37.69 and TT at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — PH at a -16.70% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does PH or TT pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.69% and TT yields 0.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or TT more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have PH and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 26.28% and TT delivered 26.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$135.40B

$1,073.87IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Trane Technologies plc

$106.12B

$482.31IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — PH vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

PH +10705.6%TT +6360.0%PH compounded faster

PH TT

PH vs TT: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($135.40B vs $106.12B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.57 vs 37.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 13.28% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.44% vs -16.70% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.83% vs 0.69%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	TT
P/E ratio	37.69	36.57
Forward P/E	34.31	31.85
P/S ratio	6.38	4.84
P/B ratio	8.38	12.45
PEG ratio	1.04	2.06
EV / EBITDA	26.50	25.35
FCF yield	2.85%	3.49%

Profitability

Metric	PH	TT
Gross margin	37.69%	35.39%
Operating margin	21.55%	17.94%
Net margin	16.97%	13.28%
ROE	22.26%	34.11%
ROIC	4.22%	20.26%

Dividends

Metric	PH	TT
Dividend yield	0.69%	0.83%
Payout ratio	85.45%	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-16.70%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.55%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.84%	21.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 37.69 and TT at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — PH at a -16.70% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does PH or TT pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.69% and TT yields 0.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or TT more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have PH and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 26.28% and TT delivered 26.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Trane Technologies ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.