Is PH or SMEGF cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.18 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.

Which has grown faster, PH or SMEGF?

Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.

Does PH or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.78% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or SMEGF more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.

Which has been the better investment, PH or SMEGF?

Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.75% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)

PH leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Total return — PH vs SMEGF

growth of $100 · last 6y

PH +359.9%SMEGF +665.1%SMEGF compounded faster

PH SMEGF

PH vs SMEGF: by the numbers

•SMEGF is the larger company ($167.76B vs $120.19B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.18 vs 65.80 P/E).
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 6.15% net margin).
•PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 7.98% CAGR).
•PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.78% vs 0.42%).

Which is better, PH or SMEGF?

Metric tally: PH 12 · SMEGF 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePH(lower P/E)

GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePH(higher dividend yield)

QualityPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	SMEGF
P/E ratio	35.18●	65.80
Forward P/E	28.00●	32.98
P/S ratio	5.81	3.63●
P/B ratio	8.35●	13.69
PEG ratio	1.04●	1.32
EV / EBITDA	23.30●	29.43
FCF yield	3.01%	4.18%●

Profitability

Metric	PH	SMEGF
Gross margin	37.23%●	18.82%
Operating margin	20.87%●	7.96%
Net margin	16.58%●	6.15%
ROE	23.82%●	23.20%
ROIC	13.69%●	9.12%

Dividends

Metric	PH	SMEGF
Dividend yield	0.78%●	0.42%
Payout ratio	26.89%	36.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	SMEGF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.15%●	7.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.00%	45.13%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	47.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.33%	45.66%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, PH or SMEGF?: It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PH (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 12 to 5.
Is PH or SMEGF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.18 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.
Which has grown faster, PH or SMEGF?: Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
Does PH or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.78% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or SMEGF more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
Which has been the better investment, PH or SMEGF?: Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.75% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full SMEGF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Siemens Energy AG P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Siemens Energy AG dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Siemens Energy AG ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Siemens Energy AG operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Siemens Energy AG revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Siemens Energy AG free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.