Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$1,001.41IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT
SMEGF
Siemens Energy AG
$175.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 11:05 AM EDT
Total return — PH vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yPH +427.0%SMEGF +594.3%SMEGF compounded faster
PH SMEGF
PH vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($150.12B vs $126.26B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.63 vs 59.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 6.15% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 7.98% CAGR).
- •PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.75% vs 0.46%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.63 | 59.16 |
| Forward P/E | 31.71 | 35.04 |
| P/S ratio | 6.05 | 3.26 |
| P/B ratio | 8.70 | 12.31 |
| PEG ratio | 1.04 | 1.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.65 | 26.03 |
| FCF yield | 2.90% | 4.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.23% | 18.82% |
| Operating margin | 20.87% | 7.96% |
| Net margin | 16.58% | 6.15% |
| ROE | 23.82% | 23.20% |
| ROIC | 13.69% | 9.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.46% |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 36.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.15% | 7.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.00% | 45.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 47.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.40% | 45.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or SMEGF?
- PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 36.63 and SMEGF at 59.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PH or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
- Does PH or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.75% and SMEGF yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or SMEGF more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
- How have PH and SMEGF total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 25.53% and SMEGF delivered 45.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROESiemens Energy AG ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 5, 2026.