Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$943.54IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SMEGF
Siemens Energy AG
$161.69IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 3:52 PM EDT
Total return — PH vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yPH +407.0% (+31.1%/yr)SMEGF +552.3% (+36.7%/yr)SMEGF compounded faster over this window
PH SMEGF
PH vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($138.30B vs $118.97B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.12 vs 44.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 7.00% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.43% vs 7.96% CAGR).
- •PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.80% vs 0.49%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.12 | 44.98 |
| Forward P/E | 26.86 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 5.53 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 7.72 | 11.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.20 | 20.80 |
| FCF yield | 3.28% | 6.67% |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.69% | 20.74% |
| Operating margin | 21.55% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 16.97% | 7.00% |
| ROE | 23.68% | 27.86% |
| ROIC | 13.94% | 14.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.49% |
| Payout ratio | 26.68% | 22.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.43% | 7.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.37% | 45.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.55% | 62.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.92% | 43.69% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or SMEGF?
- PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.12 and SMEGF at 44.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PH or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.96%.
- Does PH or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.80% and SMEGF yields 0.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or SMEGF more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus SMEGF at 7.00%.
- How have PH and SMEGF total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, PH delivered 28.92% and SMEGF delivered 43.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROESiemens Energy AG ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.