Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSY)
PH and SBGSY are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Schneider Electric S.E. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$961.09Industrials
SBGSY
Schneider Electric S.E.
$63.53Industrials
Total return — PH vs SBGSY
growth of $100 · last 18yPH +1312.5%SBGSY +469.8%PH compounded faster
PH SBGSY
PH vs SBGSY: by the numbers
- •SBGSY is the larger company ($178.64B vs $121.18B market cap).
- •SBGSY trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.22 vs 35.46 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 10.74% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 7.72% CAGR).
- •SBGSY pays the higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 0.77%).
Which is better, PH or SBGSY?
Metric tally: PH 8 · SBGSY 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSBGSY(lower P/E)
GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSBGSY(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PH | SBGSY |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.46 | 19.22● |
| Forward P/E | 28.24 | 27.73 |
| P/S ratio | 5.86 | 2.07● |
| P/B ratio | 8.42 | 6.37● |
| PEG ratio | 1.04● | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.47 | 11.42● |
| FCF yield | 2.99% | 5.96%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | SBGSY |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.23% | 41.69%● |
| Operating margin | 20.87%● | 16.35% |
| Net margin | 16.58%● | 10.74% |
| ROE | 23.82% | 33.03%● |
| ROIC | 13.69%● | 10.96% |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | SBGSY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.55%● |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 56.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | SBGSY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.15%● | 7.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.00%● | 13.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.25%● | 5.65% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.96%● | 16.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PH or SBGSY?
- It depends on your goal. value: SBGSY (lower P/E); growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SBGSY (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is PH or SBGSY cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SBGSY is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.46 P/E and SBGSY at 19.22.
- Which has grown faster, PH or SBGSY?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus SBGSY at 7.72%.
- Does PH or SBGSY pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.77% and SBGSY yields 1.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or SBGSY more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus SBGSY at 10.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, PH or SBGSY?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 26.59% versus SBGSY at 21.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioSchneider Electric S.E. P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldSchneider Electric S.E. dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROESchneider Electric S.E. ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginSchneider Electric S.E. operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthSchneider Electric S.E. revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowSchneider Electric S.E. free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & Schneider Electric S.E. appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.