Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or PWR?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.12 and PWR at 72.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PH or PWR?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.

Does PH or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.80% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or PWR more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus PWR at 4.08%.

How have PH and PWR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.74% and PWR delivered 38.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$118.97B

$943.54IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$95.72B

$636.71IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PH vs PWR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PH +807.2% (+24.7%/yr)PWR +2450.8% (+38.3%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

PH PWR

PH vs PWR: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($118.97B vs $95.72B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.12 vs 72.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 4.08% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.80% vs 0.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	PWR
P/E ratio	33.12	72.93
Forward P/E	26.86	38.05
P/S ratio	5.53	2.92
P/B ratio	7.72	9.93
EV / EBITDA	23.20	33.98
FCF yield	3.28%	2.50%

Profitability

Metric	PH	PWR
Gross margin	37.69%	14.42%
Operating margin	21.55%	6.20%
Net margin	16.97%	4.08%
ROE	23.68%	13.88%
ROIC	13.94%	8.49%

Dividends

Metric	PH	PWR
Dividend yield	0.80%	0.07%
Payout ratio	26.68%	4.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	23.02%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.37%	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.55%	42.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.92%	41.43%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PH or PWR?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: PH trades at 33.12 and PWR at 72.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PH or PWR?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PH at a 8.43% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.
Does PH or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.80% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or PWR more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.97% versus PWR at 4.08%.
How have PH and PWR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PH delivered 24.74% and PWR delivered 38.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Quanta Services dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Quanta Services ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Quanta Services operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.