Is PH or PWR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.18 P/E and PWR at 96.33.

Which has grown faster, PH or PWR?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.

Does PH or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

PH yields 0.78% and PWR yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PH or PWR more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus PWR at 3.72%.

Which has been the better investment, PH or PWR?

Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.75% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

PH leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$120.19B

$953.27Industrials

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$105.38B

$702.25Industrials

Total return — PH vs PWR

growth of $100 · last 28y

PH +3069.1%PWR +9263.3%PWR compounded faster

PH PWR

PH vs PWR: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($120.19B vs $105.38B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.18 vs 96.33 P/E).
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 3.72% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 9.15% CAGR).
•PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.78% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, PH or PWR?

Metric tally: PH 13 · PWR 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePH(lower P/E)

GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePH(higher dividend yield)

QualityPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PH	PWR
P/E ratio	35.18●	96.33
Forward P/E	28.00●	42.86
P/S ratio	5.81	3.56●
P/B ratio	8.35●	11.81
PEG ratio	1.04●	5.40
EV / EBITDA	23.30●	46.89
FCF yield	3.01%●	1.57%

Profitability

Metric	PH	PWR
Gross margin	37.23%●	13.59%
Operating margin	20.87%●	5.76%
Net margin	16.58%●	3.72%
ROE	23.82%●	12.33%
ROIC	13.69%●	7.07%

Dividends

Metric	PH	PWR
Dividend yield	0.78%●	0.06%
Payout ratio	26.89%	6.11%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PH	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.15%	21.91%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.00%●	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	17.91%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.33%	52.49%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, PH or PWR?: It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PH (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 13 to 4.
Is PH or PWR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 35.18 P/E and PWR at 96.33.
Which has grown faster, PH or PWR?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.
Does PH or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: PH yields 0.78% and PWR yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PH or PWR more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus PWR at 3.72%.
Which has been the better investment, PH or PWR?: Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.75% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PH analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Quanta Services dividend yield Parker-Hannifin ROE Quanta Services ROE Parker-Hannifin operating margin Quanta Services operating margin Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

Parker-Hannifin & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.