Which has the lower trailing P/E, PFG or RF?

RF has the lower trailing P/E: PFG trades at 16.55 and RF at 12.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PFG or RF?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — PFG at a 2.57% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.

Does PFG or RF pay a bigger dividend?

PFG yields 2.75% and RF yields 3.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PFG or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — PFG at 9.86% versus RF at 23.33%.

How have PFG and RF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PFG delivered 13.28% and RF delivered 16.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

A side-by-side comparison of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PFG

Principal Financial Group, Inc.

$24.91B

$116.33Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 1:10 PM EDT

Regions Financial Corporation

$25.73B

$30.16Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 1:10 PM EDT

Total return — PFG vs RF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PFG +243.9% (+13.1%/yr)RF +354.4% (+16.3%/yr)RF compounded faster over this window

PFG RF

PFG vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($25.73B vs $24.91B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.31 vs 16.55 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.33% vs 9.86% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 2.57% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.63% vs 2.75%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PFG	RF
P/E ratio	16.55	12.31
Forward P/E	12.13	11.42
P/S ratio	1.59	2.69
P/B ratio	2.05	1.37

Profitability

Metric	PFG	RF
Gross margin	48.54%	76.85%
Operating margin	12.13%	29.77%
Net margin	9.86%	23.33%
ROE	12.74%	11.85%

Dividends

Metric	PFG	RF
Dividend yield	2.75%	3.63%
Payout ratio	45.38%	44.69%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PFG	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.57%	7.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.93%	17.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.37%	13.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PFG or RF?: RF has the lower trailing P/E: PFG trades at 16.55 and RF at 12.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PFG or RF?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — PFG at a 2.57% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.
Does PFG or RF pay a bigger dividend?: PFG yields 2.75% and RF yields 3.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PFG or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — PFG at 9.86% versus RF at 23.33%.
How have PFG and RF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PFG delivered 13.28% and RF delivered 16.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PFG analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Principal Financial P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Principal Financial dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Principal Financial ROE Regions Financial ROE Principal Financial operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Principal Financial revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth

Principal Financial & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.