Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)
RF leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$111.12Financial Services
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
$29.27Financial Services
Total return — PFG vs RF
growth of $100 · last 25yPFG +429.1%RF +32.7%PFG compounded faster
PFG RF
PFG vs RF: by the numbers
- •RF is the larger company ($24.98B vs $24.00B market cap).
- •RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.20 vs 15.92 P/E).
- •RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 10.03% net margin).
- •RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 2.90% CAGR).
- •RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 2.87%).
Which is better, PFG or RF?
Metric tally: PFG 3 · RF 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRF(lower P/E)
GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)
QualityRF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PFG | RF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.92 | 12.20● |
| Forward P/E | 11.91 | 11.19● |
| P/S ratio | 1.58● | 2.64 |
| P/B ratio | 2.07 | 1.35● |
| PEG ratio | 17.12 | 0.58● |
Profitability
| Metric | PFG | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.68% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 12.36% | 29.48%● |
| Net margin | 10.03% | 23.13%● |
| ROE | 13.12%● | 11.85% |
| ROIC | 0.37% | 13.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PFG | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 3.62%● |
| Payout ratio | 59.96% | 45.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PFG | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.90% | 7.48%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.93% | 17.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.40%● | 10.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PFG or RF?
- It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 11 to 3.
- Is PFG or RF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: PFG trades at a 15.92 P/E and RF at 12.20.
- Which has grown faster, PFG or RF?
- Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — PFG at a 2.90% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.
- Does PFG or RF pay a bigger dividend?
- PFG yields 2.87% and RF yields 3.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PFG or RF more profitable?
- RF runs the higher net margin — PFG at 10.03% versus RF at 23.13%.
- Which has been the better investment, PFG or RF?
- Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — PFG at 14.26% versus RF at 16.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Principal Financial P/E ratioRegions Financial P/E ratioPrincipal Financial dividend yieldRegions Financial dividend yieldPrincipal Financial ROERegions Financial ROEPrincipal Financial operating marginRegions Financial operating marginPrincipal Financial revenue growthRegions Financial revenue growthPrincipal Financial free cash flowRegions Financial free cash flow
Principal Financial & Regions Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.