Phillips Edison & Co. (PECO) vs Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK)
A side-by-side comparison of Phillips Edison & Co. and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — PECO vs PK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yPECO vs PK: by the numbers
- •PECO is the larger company ($4.79B vs $3.09B market cap).
- •PECO is profitable (19.13% net margin) while PK runs a net loss (-6.41%).
- •PK grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.46% vs 8.01% CAGR).
- •PK pays the higher dividend yield (6.55% vs 3.48%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PECO | PK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.43 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 43.34 | 33.60 |
| PEG ratio | 0.41 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 6.38 | 1.22 |
| P/B ratio | 2.02 | 1.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.34 | 11.24 |
| FCF yield | 4.97% | 2.62% |
For REITs like Phillips Edison & Co., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Park Hotels & Resorts Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | PECO | PK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -1.39% | 1.97% |
| Operating margin | 29.03% | 13.42% |
| Net margin | 19.13% | -6.41% |
| ROE | 6.05% | -5.28% |
| ROIC | 4.14% | 4.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | PECO | PK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 6.55% |
| Payout ratio | 113.59% | N/A |
Phillips Edison & Co.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PECO | PK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.01% | 29.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 78.78% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.16% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.30% | 1.34% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, PECO or PK?
- Over the past five years, PK grew revenue faster — PECO at a 8.01% CAGR versus PK at 29.46%.
- Does PECO or PK pay a bigger dividend?
- PECO yields 3.48% and PK yields 6.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PECO or PK more profitable?
- PECO runs the higher net margin — PECO at 19.13% versus PK at -6.41%.
- How have PECO and PK total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, PECO delivered 7.30% and PK delivered 1.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Phillips Edison & Park Hotels & Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.