Which has grown faster, PDI or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — PDI at a 22.34% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.

Does PDI or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

PDI pays a dividend (17.33% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is PDI or WULF more profitable?

PDI runs the higher net margin — PDI at 64.09% versus WULF at -1179.94%.

How have PDI and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PDI delivered 5.62% and WULF delivered 7.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PDI

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund

$7.01B

$15.18Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 9:55 AM EDT

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$8.10B

$16.36Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 9:55 AM EDT

Total return — PDI vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PDI +72.8% (+5.6%/yr)WULF +92.3% (+6.8%/yr)WULF compounded faster over this window

PDI WULF

PDI vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($8.10B vs $7.01B market cap).
•PDI is profitable (64.09% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 22.34% CAGR).
•PDI pays a dividend (17.33% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PDI	WULF
P/S ratio	N/A	49.06
P/B ratio	0.93	55.03

Profitability

Metric	PDI	WULF
Gross margin	87.09%	50.93%
Operating margin	78.88%	-101.10%
Net margin	64.09%	-1179.94%
ROE	7.79%	-1323.42%

Dividends

Metric	PDI	WULF
Dividend yield	17.33%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PDI	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.34%	73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-22.73%	-27.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.94%	-6.00%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, PDI or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — PDI at a 22.34% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Does PDI or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: PDI pays a dividend (17.33% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is PDI or WULF more profitable?: PDI runs the higher net margin — PDI at 64.09% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have PDI and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PDI delivered 5.62% and WULF delivered 7.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PDI analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund dividend yield PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund ROE TeraWulf ROE PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund operating margin TeraWulf operating margin PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.