PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of PagerDuty, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: PD is classified in Technology; UHS is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
PD
PagerDuty, Inc.
$14.48TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$181.21HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — PD vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yPD -64.5% (-13.8%/yr)UHS +35.2% (+4.4%/yr)UHS compounded faster over this window
PD UHS
PD vs UHS: by the numbers
- •UHS is the larger company ($10.97B vs $1.32B market cap).
- •PD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.24 vs 7.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PD converts more revenue to profit (36.58% vs 8.42% net margin).
- •PD grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.17% vs 8.21% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while PD has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PD | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 7.24 | 7.43 |
| Forward P/E | 10.68 | 8.04 |
| P/S ratio | 2.67 | 0.61 |
| P/B ratio | 5.69 | 1.46 |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.08 | 5.96 |
| FCF yield | 9.59% | 7.54% |
Profitability
| Metric | PD | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.84% | 90.69% |
| Operating margin | 6.47% | 11.36% |
| Net margin | 36.58% | 8.42% |
| ROE | 78.02% | 20.31% |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 11.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | PD | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.46% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 3.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PD | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.17% | 8.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 70.04% | -12.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -20.38% | 3.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PD or UHS?
- PD has the lower trailing P/E: PD trades at 7.24 and UHS at 7.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PD or UHS?
- Over the past five years, PD grew revenue faster — PD at a 15.17% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
- Does PD or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while PD has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is PD or UHS more profitable?
- PD runs the higher net margin — PD at 36.58% versus UHS at 8.42%.
- How have PD and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, PD delivered -20.38% and UHS delivered 3.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
PagerDuty P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioUniversal Health Services dividend yieldPagerDuty ROEUniversal Health Services ROEPagerDuty operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginPagerDuty revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthPagerDuty free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
PagerDuty & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.