Which has the lower trailing P/E, PD or PRGS?

PD has the lower trailing P/E: PD trades at 7.68 and PRGS at 17.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PD or PRGS?

Over the past five years, PD grew revenue faster — PD at a 15.17% CAGR versus PRGS at 14.26%.

Is PD or PRGS more profitable?

PD runs the higher net margin — PD at 36.58% versus PRGS at 9.24%.

How have PD and PRGS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PD delivered -17.22% and PRGS delivered -4.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) vs Progress Software Corporation (PRGS)

A side-by-side comparison of PagerDuty, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PagerDuty, Inc.

$1.40B

$15.36TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

PRGS

Progress Software Corporation

$1.51B

$36.90TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

Total return — PD vs PRGS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

PD -59.2% (-12.0%/yr)PRGS -11.5% (-1.7%/yr)PRGS compounded faster over this window

PD PRGS

PD vs PRGS: by the numbers

•PRGS is the larger company ($1.51B vs $1.40B market cap).
•PD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.68 vs 17.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PD converts more revenue to profit (36.58% vs 9.24% net margin).
•PD grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.17% vs 14.26% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PD	PRGS
P/E ratio	7.68	17.00
Forward P/E	11.33	5.96
P/S ratio	2.83	1.51
P/B ratio	6.04	2.86
EV / EBITDA	35.90	8.73
FCF yield	9.04%	21.09%

Profitability

Metric	PD	PRGS
Gross margin	84.84%	79.66%
Operating margin	6.47%	18.13%
Net margin	36.58%	9.24%
ROE	78.02%	17.44%
ROIC	4.77%	7.97%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PD	PRGS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.17%	14.26%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-0.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-17.22%	-4.90%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PD or PRGS?: PD has the lower trailing P/E: PD trades at 7.68 and PRGS at 17.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PD or PRGS?: Over the past five years, PD grew revenue faster — PD at a 15.17% CAGR versus PRGS at 14.26%.
Is PD or PRGS more profitable?: PD runs the higher net margin — PD at 36.58% versus PRGS at 9.24%.
How have PD and PRGS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PD delivered -17.22% and PRGS delivered -4.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PD analysis Full PRGS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

PagerDuty P/E ratio Progress Software P/E ratio PagerDuty ROE Progress Software ROE PagerDuty operating margin Progress Software operating margin PagerDuty revenue growth Progress Software revenue growth PagerDuty free cash flow Progress Software free cash flow

PagerDuty & Progress Software appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.