PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ) vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE)
Over the past 3 years, PCQ lagged ROE — 2.33% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — PCQ vs ROE
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yMetrics side by side
Did PCQ beat ROE?
Over the past 3 years, PCQ lagged ROE — 2.33% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | PCQ | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -7.74% | 24.38% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 2.33% | 23.75% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.17% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | -2.80% | N/A |
ROE is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has PCQ beaten ROE?
- Over the past 3 years, PCQ lagged ROE — 2.33% vs 23.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.