PG&E Corporation (PCG) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)
PCG leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of PG&E Corporation and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — PCG vs VST
growth of $100 · last 10yPCG -70.9%VST +950.8%VST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
PCG VST
PCG vs VST: by the numbers
- •VST is the larger company ($54.92B vs $37.70B market cap).
- •PCG trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.38 vs 27.10 P/E).
- •VST converts more revenue to profit (13.82% vs 11.43% net margin).
- •VST grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.97% vs 6.47% CAGR).
- •PCG pays the higher dividend yield (0.88% vs 0.56%).
Which is better, PCG or VST?
Metric tally: PCG 9 · VST 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePCG(lower P/E)
GrowthVST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePCG(higher dividend yield)
QualityPCG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PCG | VST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.38● | 27.10 |
| Forward P/E | 9.50● | 14.38 |
| P/S ratio | 1.51● | 3.41 |
| P/B ratio | 1.17● | 9.89 |
| PEG ratio | 7.90 | 2.42● |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.53● | 11.48 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | PCG | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.93%● | 12.72% |
| Operating margin | 19.35%● | 2.07% |
| Net margin | 11.43% | 13.82%● |
| ROE | 8.88% | 40.04%● |
| ROIC | 3.79%● | 3.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | PCG | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.88%● | 0.56% |
| Payout ratio | 12.71% | 41.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PCG | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.47% | 6.97%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.76% | 11.20%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.38% | -11.04%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.67% | 57.80%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PCG or VST?
- It depends on your goal. value: PCG (lower P/E); growth: VST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PCG (higher dividend yield); quality: PCG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PCG leads 9 to 7.
- Is PCG or VST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PCG is cheaper: PCG trades at a 13.38 P/E and VST at 27.10.
- Which has grown faster, PCG or VST?
- Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — PCG at a 6.47% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.
- Does PCG or VST pay a bigger dividend?
- PCG yields 0.88% and VST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PCG or VST more profitable?
- VST runs the higher net margin — PCG at 11.43% versus VST at 13.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, PCG or VST?
- Over the past 5-year, VST delivered the higher annualized total return — PCG at -11.63% versus VST at 57.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
PG&E P/E ratioVistra P/E ratioPG&E dividend yieldVistra dividend yieldPG&E ROEVistra ROEPG&E operating marginVistra operating marginPG&E revenue growthVistra revenue growthPG&E free cash flowVistra free cash flow
PG&E & Vistra appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.