Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
A side-by-side comparison of Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
PBA
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
$48.01EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
$364.38EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — PBA vs TPL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yPBA +177.2% (+10.7%/yr)TPL +2121.8% (+36.4%/yr)TPL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
PBA TPL
PBA vs TPL: by the numbers
- •PBA is the larger company ($27.91B vs $25.13B market cap).
- •PBA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.85 vs 47.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.32% vs 22.54% net margin).
- •TPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.25% vs 0.33% CAGR).
- •PBA pays the higher dividend yield (4.29% vs 0.61%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PBA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.85 | 47.16 |
| Forward P/E | 15.24 | 42.01 |
| P/S ratio | 4.96 | 28.44 |
| P/B ratio | 2.34 | 15.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.29 | 34.17 |
| FCF yield | 5.27% | 2.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | PBA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.62% | 85.46% |
| Operating margin | 34.04% | 74.92% |
| Net margin | 22.54% | 60.32% |
| ROE | 10.66% | 32.37% |
| ROIC | 6.05% | 30.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | PBA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.29% | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | 107.09% | 32.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PBA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.33% | 22.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 22.57% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.92% | 19.60% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 20.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PBA or TPL?
- PBA has the lower trailing P/E: PBA trades at 23.85 and TPL at 47.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PBA or TPL?
- Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — PBA at a 0.33% CAGR versus TPL at 22.25%.
- Does PBA or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- PBA yields 4.29% and TPL yields 0.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PBA or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — PBA at 22.54% versus TPL at 60.32%.
- How have PBA and TPL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, PBA delivered 10.69% and TPL delivered 36.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Pembina Pipeline P/E ratioTexas Pacific L P/E ratioPembina Pipeline dividend yieldTexas Pacific L dividend yieldPembina Pipeline ROETexas Pacific L ROEPembina Pipeline operating marginTexas Pacific L operating marginPembina Pipeline revenue growthTexas Pacific L revenue growthPembina Pipeline free cash flowTexas Pacific L free cash flow
Pembina Pipeline & Texas Pacific L appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.