Which has grown faster, PATH or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is PATH or WULF more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus WULF at -611.46%.

How have PATH and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -27.55% and WULF delivered 3.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

UiPath Inc. (PATH) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of UiPath Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$6.70B

$12.59TechnologyAt close: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$7.48B

$15.09TechnologyAt close: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — PATH vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

PATH -81.8%WULF +85.7%WULF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PATH WULF

PATH vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($7.48B vs $6.70B market cap).
•PATH is profitable (19.58% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 19.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PATH	WULF
P/E ratio	20.88	N/A
Forward P/E	18.69	N/A
P/S ratio	3.97	37.98
P/B ratio	3.49	42.72
EV / EBITDA	48.83	N/A
FCF yield	5.65%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	PATH	WULF
Gross margin	82.96%	50.93%
Operating margin	6.19%	-101.10%
Net margin	19.58%	-611.46%
ROE	17.21%	-470.94%
ROIC	2.67%	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PATH	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.70%	66.83%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	65.27%	-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-27.55%	-3.06%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, PATH or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is PATH or WULF more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus WULF at -611.46%.
How have PATH and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -27.55% and WULF delivered 3.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PATH analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

UiPath P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio UiPath dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield UiPath ROE TeraWulf ROE UiPath operating margin TeraWulf operating margin UiPath revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth UiPath free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

UiPath & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.