Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or TTD?

TTD has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 23.22 and TTD at 20.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PATH or TTD?

Over the past five years, TTD grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus TTD at 23.62%.

Is PATH or TTD more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus TTD at 13.61%.

How have PATH and TTD total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -26.00% and TTD delivered -26.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

UiPath Inc. (PATH) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD)

A side-by-side comparison of UiPath Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 7, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$7.45B

$14.00TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TTD

The Trade Desk, Inc.

$8.31B

$17.67TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PATH vs TTD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

PATH -79.7%TTD -75.0%TTD compounded faster

PATH TTD

PATH vs TTD: by the numbers

•TTD is the larger company ($8.31B vs $7.45B market cap).
•TTD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.79 vs 23.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 13.61% net margin).
•TTD grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.62% vs 19.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PATH	TTD
P/E ratio	23.22	20.79
Forward P/E	20.79	17.71
P/S ratio	4.42	2.78
P/B ratio	3.88	3.23
PEG ratio	N/A	2.75
EV / EBITDA	54.79	10.23
FCF yield	5.08%	13.72%

Profitability

Metric	PATH	TTD
Gross margin	82.96%	83.04%
Operating margin	6.19%	19.61%
Net margin	19.58%	13.61%
ROE	17.21%	15.81%
ROIC	2.67%	13.38%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PATH	TTD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.70%	23.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	12.09%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	65.27%	32.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-26.00%	-26.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or TTD?: TTD has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 23.22 and TTD at 20.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PATH or TTD?: Over the past five years, TTD grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus TTD at 23.62%.
Is PATH or TTD more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus TTD at 13.61%.
How have PATH and TTD total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -26.00% and TTD delivered -26.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PATH analysis Full TTD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

UiPath P/E ratio Trade Desk P/E ratio UiPath dividend yield Trade Desk dividend yield UiPath ROE Trade Desk ROE UiPath operating margin Trade Desk operating margin UiPath revenue growth Trade Desk revenue growth UiPath free cash flow Trade Desk free cash flow

UiPath & Trade Desk appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 7, 2026.