Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 20.22 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PATH or SIMO?

Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does PATH or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while PATH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is PATH or SIMO more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

How have PATH and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -28.02% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

UiPath Inc. (PATH) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of UiPath Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$6.48B

$12.19TechnologyAt close: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$7.43B

$221.42TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PATH vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

PATH -84.3%SIMO +310.4%SIMO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PATH SIMO

PATH vs SIMO: by the numbers

•SIMO is the larger company ($7.43B vs $6.48B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.04 vs 20.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 16.02% net margin).
•PATH grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.70% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while PATH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PATH	SIMO
P/E ratio	20.22	19.04
Forward P/E	18.10	27.53
P/S ratio	3.85	2.32
P/B ratio	3.38	2.47
PEG ratio	N/A	0.17
EV / EBITDA	47.14	15.02
FCF yield	5.83%	0.31%

Profitability

Metric	PATH	SIMO
Gross margin	82.96%	48.09%
Operating margin	6.19%	12.77%
Net margin	19.58%	16.02%
ROE	17.21%	18.76%
ROIC	2.67%	9.22%

Dividends

Metric	PATH	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.82%
Payout ratio	N/A	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PATH	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.70%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	65.27%	-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.02%	35.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 20.22 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PATH or SIMO?: Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does PATH or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while PATH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is PATH or SIMO more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
How have PATH and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -28.02% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PATH analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

UiPath P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio UiPath dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield UiPath ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE UiPath operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin UiPath revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth UiPath free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

UiPath & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.