Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or RMBS?

PATH has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 26.17 and RMBS at 41.67. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PATH or RMBS?

Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.

Is PATH or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus RMBS at 31.69%.

How have PATH and RMBS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -23.54% and RMBS delivered 20.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

UiPath Inc. (PATH) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

A side-by-side comparison of UiPath Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$8.39B

$15.78TechnologyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$9.85B

$90.85TechnologyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — PATH vs RMBS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

PATH -77.1% (-25.6%/yr)RMBS +346.4% (+34.9%/yr)RMBS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PATH RMBS

PATH vs RMBS: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($9.85B vs $8.39B market cap).
•PATH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.17 vs 41.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 19.58% net margin).
•RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.51% vs 19.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PATH	RMBS
P/E ratio	26.17	41.67
Forward P/E	23.43	29.93
P/S ratio	4.98	13.20
P/B ratio	4.38	6.80
EV / EBITDA	62.32	32.66
FCF yield	4.50%	3.00%

Profitability

Metric	PATH	RMBS
Gross margin	82.96%	78.27%
Operating margin	6.19%	35.51%
Net margin	19.58%	31.69%
ROE	17.21%	16.34%
ROIC	4.97%	14.56%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PATH	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.70%	22.51%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	65.27%	14.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-23.54%	31.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PATH or RMBS?: PATH has the lower trailing P/E: PATH trades at 26.17 and RMBS at 41.67. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PATH or RMBS?: Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.
Is PATH or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus RMBS at 31.69%.
How have PATH and RMBS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PATH delivered -23.54% and RMBS delivered 20.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PATH analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

UiPath P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio UiPath ROE Rambus ROE UiPath operating margin Rambus operating margin UiPath revenue growth Rambus revenue growth UiPath free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

UiPath & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.