Is PATH or PLXS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PATH is cheaper: PATH trades at a 17.03 P/E and PLXS at 43.86.

Which has grown faster, PATH or PLXS?

Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus PLXS at 4.36%.

Is PATH or PLXS more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus PLXS at 4.35%.

Which has been the better investment, PATH or PLXS?

Over the past 5-year, PLXS delivered the higher annualized total return — PATH at -31.83% versus PLXS at 21.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

UiPath Inc. (PATH) vs Plexus Corp. (PLXS)

PATH leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of UiPath Inc. and Plexus Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — PATH vs PLXS

growth of $100 · last 5y

PATH -85.1%PLXS +230.2%PLXS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PATH PLXS

PATH vs PLXS: by the numbers

•PLXS is the larger company ($8.03B vs $5.46B market cap).
•PATH trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.03 vs 43.86 P/E).
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 4.35% net margin).
•PATH grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.70% vs 4.36% CAGR).

Which is better, PATH or PLXS?

Metric tally: PATH 10 · PLXS 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePATH(lower P/E)

GrowthPATH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityPLXS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PATH	PLXS
P/E ratio	17.03●	43.86
Forward P/E	15.25●	36.59
P/S ratio	3.24	1.90●
P/B ratio	2.85●	5.51
PEG ratio	—	0.40
EV / EBITDA	30.41	27.50●
FCF yield	6.92%●	0.92%

Profitability

Metric	PATH	PLXS
Gross margin	82.96%●	10.05%
Operating margin	6.19%●	5.17%
Net margin	19.58%●	4.35%
ROE	17.21%●	12.59%
ROIC	2.67%	11.13%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PATH	PLXS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.70%●	4.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	10.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	65.27%●	-18.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-31.83%	28.01%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, PATH or PLXS?: It depends on your goal. value: PATH (lower P/E); growth: PATH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PLXS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PATH leads 10 to 4.
Is PATH or PLXS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PATH is cheaper: PATH trades at a 17.03 P/E and PLXS at 43.86.
Which has grown faster, PATH or PLXS?: Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — PATH at a 19.70% CAGR versus PLXS at 4.36%.
Is PATH or PLXS more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — PATH at 19.58% versus PLXS at 4.35%.
Which has been the better investment, PATH or PLXS?: Over the past 5-year, PLXS delivered the higher annualized total return — PATH at -31.83% versus PLXS at 21.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PATH analysis Full PLXS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

UiPath P/E ratio Plexus P/E ratio UiPath dividend yield Plexus dividend yield UiPath ROE Plexus ROE UiPath operating margin Plexus operating margin UiPath revenue growth Plexus revenue growth UiPath free cash flow Plexus free cash flow

UiPath & Plexus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.