Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
PANW and TXN are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 30, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
$356.20Technology
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$299.15Technology
Total return — PANW vs TXN
growth of $100 · last 14yPANW +3753.3%TXN +993.8%PANW compounded faster
PANW TXN
PANW vs TXN: by the numbers
- •TXN is the larger company ($272.25B vs $242.76B market cap).
- •TXN trades at the lower earnings multiple (50.95 vs 296.54 P/E).
- •TXN converts more revenue to profit (29.11% vs 7.95% net margin).
- •PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.62% vs 3.64% CAGR).
- •TXN pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, PANW or TXN?
Metric tally: PANW 8 · TXN 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTXN(lower P/E)
GrowthPANW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTXN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PANW | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 296.54 | 50.95● |
| Forward P/E | 83.40 | 33.30● |
| P/S ratio | 23.92 | 14.78● |
| P/B ratio | 9.17● | 16.24 |
| PEG ratio | 4.27● | 7.94 |
| EV / EBITDA | 133.03 | 32.81● |
| FCF yield | 1.69%● | 1.37% |
Profitability
| Metric | PANW | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.94%● | 57.32% |
| Operating margin | 9.65% | 35.29%● |
| Net margin | 7.95% | 29.11%● |
| ROE | 3.05% | 31.99%● |
| ROIC | 5.67% | 16.46%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PANW | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.91% |
| Payout ratio | — | 104.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PANW | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 21.62%● | 3.64% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 69.46%● | -2.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 25.30%● | -10.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 40.71%● | 12.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PANW or TXN?
- It depends on your goal. value: TXN (lower P/E); growth: PANW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TXN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is PANW or TXN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: PANW trades at a 296.54 P/E and TXN at 50.95.
- Which has grown faster, PANW or TXN?
- Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — PANW at a 21.62% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.
- Does PANW or TXN pay a bigger dividend?
- TXN pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
- Is PANW or TXN more profitable?
- TXN runs the higher net margin — PANW at 7.95% versus TXN at 29.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, PANW or TXN?
- Over the past 10-year, PANW delivered the higher annualized total return — PANW at 32.51% versus TXN at 20.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Palo Alto Networks P/E ratioTexas Instruments P/E ratioPalo Alto Networks dividend yieldTexas Instruments dividend yieldPalo Alto Networks ROETexas Instruments ROEPalo Alto Networks operating marginTexas Instruments operating marginPalo Alto Networks revenue growthTexas Instruments revenue growthPalo Alto Networks free cash flowTexas Instruments free cash flow
Palo Alto Networks & Texas Instruments appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 30, 2026.