Pamt Corp. (PAMT) vs Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH)

A side-by-side comparison of Pamt Corp. and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — PAMT vs PPIH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
PAMT -24.0% (-12.8%/yr)PPIH +146.7% (+57.1%/yr)PPIH compounded faster over this window
50100150200250Start $10020252026$76$247
PAMT PPIH

PAMT vs PPIH: by the numbers

  • •PPIH is the larger company ($261M vs $243M market cap).
  • •PPIH is profitable (6.89% net margin) while PAMT runs a net loss (-7.07%).
  • •PPIH grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.40% vs 0.80% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricPAMTPPIH
P/E ratioN/A16.94
Forward P/EN/A21.17
P/S ratio0.411.16
P/B ratio1.202.80
EV / EBITDAN/A8.42
FCF yieldN/A5.22%

Profitability

MetricPAMTPPIH
Gross margin-9.38%31.13%
Operating margin-13.08%12.06%
Net margin-7.07%6.89%
ROE-20.82%16.67%
ROIC-12.78%12.49%

Growth (annualized)

MetricPAMTPPIH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.80%16.40%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A29.99%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, PAMT or PPIH?
Over the past five years, PPIH grew revenue faster — PAMT at a 0.80% CAGR versus PPIH at 16.40%.
Is PAMT or PPIH more profitable?
PPIH runs the higher net margin — PAMT at -7.07% versus PPIH at 6.89%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.