Everpure, Inc. (P) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
A side-by-side comparison of Everpure, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 17, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
P
Everpure, Inc.
$117.72IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$99.20IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT
Total return — P vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yP +755.6% (+23.9%/yr)TRI +167.6% (+10.3%/yr)P compounded faster over this window
P TRI
P vs TRI: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($43.31B vs $39.13B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.63 vs 179.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 5.75% net margin).
- •P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 4.88% CAGR).
- •TRI pays a dividend (3.81% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | P | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 179.03 | 27.63 |
| Forward P/E | 60.72 | 23.52 |
| P/S ratio | 9.80 | 5.80 |
| P/B ratio | 26.75 | 4.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 118.62 | 15.35 |
| FCF yield | 1.34% | 4.88% |
Profitability
| Metric | P | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.23% | 79.56% |
| Operating margin | 4.21% | 27.64% |
| Net margin | 5.75% | 21.22% |
| ROE | 15.69% | 14.96% |
| ROIC | 3.43% | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | P | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.81% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | P | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.87% | 4.88% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 47.05% | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 42.73% | -1.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, P or TRI?
- TRI has the lower trailing P/E: P trades at 179.03 and TRI at 27.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, P or TRI?
- Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — P at a 17.87% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.
- Does P or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI pays a dividend (3.81% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is P or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — P at 5.75% versus TRI at 21.22%.
- How have P and TRI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, P delivered 24.11% and TRI delivered 10.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Everpure P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldEverpure ROEThomson Reuters ROEEverpure operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginEverpure revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthEverpure free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Everpure & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 17, 2026.