Which has the lower trailing P/E, OSW or VC?

VC has the lower trailing P/E: OSW trades at 29.47 and VC at 16.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, OSW or VC?

Over the past five years, OSW grew revenue faster — OSW at a 118.32% CAGR versus VC at 5.51%.

Does OSW or VC pay a bigger dividend?

OSW yields 0.86% and VC yields 1.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is OSW or VC more profitable?

OSW runs the higher net margin — OSW at 8.02% versus VC at 4.00%.

How have OSW and VC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, OSW delivered 17.35% and VC delivered -1.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd (OSW) vs Visteon Corporation (VC)

A side-by-side comparison of OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd and Visteon Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

OSW

OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd

$2.36B

$23.28Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Visteon Corporation

$2.38B

$89.31Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — OSW vs VC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

OSW +141.9% (+10.3%/yr)VC -29.8% (-3.9%/yr)OSW compounded faster over this window

OSW VC

OSW vs VC: by the numbers

•VC is the larger company ($2.38B vs $2.36B market cap).
•VC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.30 vs 29.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•OSW converts more revenue to profit (8.02% vs 4.00% net margin).
•OSW grew revenue faster over the past five years (118.32% vs 5.51% CAGR).
•VC pays the higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 0.86%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	OSW	VC
P/E ratio	29.47	16.30
Forward P/E	20.48	10.52
P/S ratio	2.34	0.63
P/B ratio	4.06	1.48
EV / EBITDA	19.66	5.52
FCF yield	3.31%	6.71%

Profitability

Metric	OSW	VC
Gross margin	14.29%	12.81%
Operating margin	9.48%	7.36%
Net margin	8.02%	4.00%
ROE	13.90%	9.37%
ROIC	13.60%	6.68%

Dividends

Metric	OSW	VC
Dividend yield	0.86%	1.57%
Payout ratio	25.32%	25.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	OSW	VC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	118.32%	5.51%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	7.78%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.35%	-1.81%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, OSW or VC?: VC has the lower trailing P/E: OSW trades at 29.47 and VC at 16.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, OSW or VC?: Over the past five years, OSW grew revenue faster — OSW at a 118.32% CAGR versus VC at 5.51%.
Does OSW or VC pay a bigger dividend?: OSW yields 0.86% and VC yields 1.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is OSW or VC more profitable?: OSW runs the higher net margin — OSW at 8.02% versus VC at 4.00%.
How have OSW and VC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, OSW delivered 17.35% and VC delivered -1.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full OSW analysis Full VC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

OneSpaWorld P/E ratio Visteon P/E ratio OneSpaWorld dividend yield Visteon dividend yield OneSpaWorld ROE Visteon ROE OneSpaWorld operating margin Visteon operating margin OneSpaWorld revenue growth Visteon revenue growth OneSpaWorld free cash flow Visteon free cash flow

OneSpaWorld & Visteon appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.