Which has grown faster, OSCR or UHS?

Over the past five years, OSCR grew revenue faster — OSCR at a 73.14% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.

Does OSCR or UHS pay a bigger dividend?

UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while OSCR does not currently pay one.

Is OSCR or UHS more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — OSCR at -0.30% versus UHS at 8.56%.

Which has been the better investment, OSCR or UHS?

Over the past 5-year, OSCR delivered the higher annualized total return — OSCR at 6.02% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

UHS leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Oscar Health, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$9.12B

$145.69Healthcare

Total return — OSCR vs UHS

growth of $100 · last 5y

OSCR -14.4%UHS +12.6%UHS compounded faster

OSCR UHS

OSCR vs UHS: by the numbers

•UHS is the larger company ($9.12B vs $7.72B market cap).
•UHS is profitable (8.56% net margin) while OSCR runs a net loss (-0.30%).
•OSCR grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.14% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while OSCR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, OSCR or UHS?

Metric tally: OSCR 4 · UHS 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthOSCR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityUHS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	OSCR	UHS
P/E ratio	—	6.11
Forward P/E	20.60	6.21●
P/S ratio	0.74	0.51●
P/B ratio	5.90	1.19●
PEG ratio	—	0.26
EV / EBITDA	136.96	5.25●
FCF yield	28.49%●	9.94%

Profitability

Metric	OSCR	UHS
Gross margin	17.39%	90.45%●
Operating margin	0.08%	11.50%●
Net margin	-0.30%	8.56%●
ROE	-2.37%	20.19%●
ROIC	-27.10%	11.29%●

Dividends

Metric	OSCR	UHS
Dividend yield	—	0.55%
Payout ratio	—	3.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	OSCR	UHS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	73.14%●	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	16.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	46.32%●	-4.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%●	-0.22%

Frequently asked

Which is better, OSCR or UHS?: It depends on your goal. growth: OSCR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 9 to 4.
Which has grown faster, OSCR or UHS?: Over the past five years, OSCR grew revenue faster — OSCR at a 73.14% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
Does OSCR or UHS pay a bigger dividend?: UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while OSCR does not currently pay one.
Is OSCR or UHS more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — OSCR at -0.30% versus UHS at 8.56%.
Which has been the better investment, OSCR or UHS?: Over the past 5-year, OSCR delivered the higher annualized total return — OSCR at 6.02% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full OSCR analysis Full UHS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Oscar Health P/E ratio Universal Health Services P/E ratio Oscar Health dividend yield Universal Health Services dividend yield Oscar Health ROE Universal Health Services ROE Oscar Health operating margin Universal Health Services operating margin Oscar Health revenue growth Universal Health Services revenue growth Oscar Health free cash flow Universal Health Services free cash flow

Oscar Health & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.