Is ONTO or TYL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TYL is cheaper: ONTO trades at a 141.99 P/E and TYL at 44.06.

Which has grown faster, ONTO or TYL?

Over the past five years, TYL grew revenue faster — ONTO at a 11.93% CAGR versus TYL at 15.97%.

Is ONTO or TYL more profitable?

TYL runs the higher net margin — ONTO at 10.33% versus TYL at 13.26%.

Which has been the better investment, ONTO or TYL?

Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — ONTO at 30.06% versus TYL at 6.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) vs Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL)

TYL leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Onto Innovation Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 7, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

$13.64B

$323.50Technology

Total return — ONTO vs TYL

growth of $100 · last 30y

ONTO +4998.8%TYL +14534.2%TYL compounded faster

ONTO TYL

ONTO vs TYL: by the numbers

•ONTO is the larger company ($13.87B vs $13.64B market cap).
•TYL trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.06 vs 141.99 P/E).
•TYL converts more revenue to profit (13.26% vs 10.33% net margin).
•TYL grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.97% vs 11.93% CAGR).

Which is better, ONTO or TYL?

Metric tally: ONTO 3 · TYL 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTYL(lower P/E)

GrowthTYL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTYL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ONTO	TYL
P/E ratio	141.99	44.06●
Forward P/E	61.15	24.74●
P/S ratio	14.74	5.79●
P/B ratio	7.13	3.87●
PEG ratio	4.13	3.33●
EV / EBITDA	79.29	26.97●
FCF yield	1.57%	4.99%●

Profitability

Metric	ONTO	TYL
Gross margin	48.80%●	45.57%
Operating margin	10.53%	15.47%●
Net margin	10.33%	13.26%●
ROE	4.99%	8.87%●
ROIC	5.18%	6.44%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ONTO	TYL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.93%	15.97%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.40%●	8.49%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.03%	14.98%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	32.50%●	-7.02%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ONTO or TYL?: It depends on your goal. value: TYL (lower P/E); growth: TYL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TYL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TYL leads 13 to 3.
Is ONTO or TYL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TYL is cheaper: ONTO trades at a 141.99 P/E and TYL at 44.06.
Which has grown faster, ONTO or TYL?: Over the past five years, TYL grew revenue faster — ONTO at a 11.93% CAGR versus TYL at 15.97%.
Is ONTO or TYL more profitable?: TYL runs the higher net margin — ONTO at 10.33% versus TYL at 13.26%.
Which has been the better investment, ONTO or TYL?: Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — ONTO at 30.06% versus TYL at 6.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ONTO analysis Full TYL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Onto Innovation P/E ratio Tyler Technologies P/E ratio Onto Innovation dividend yield Tyler Technologies dividend yield Onto Innovation ROE Tyler Technologies ROE Onto Innovation operating margin Tyler Technologies operating margin Onto Innovation revenue growth Tyler Technologies revenue growth Onto Innovation free cash flow Tyler Technologies free cash flow

Onto Innovation & Tyler Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 7, 2026.